“Let our rigorous testing and reviews be your guidelines to A/V equipment – not marketing slogans”
Facebook Youtube Twitter instagram pinterest

Polk Legend L800 SDA Loudspeaker Review

by April 05, 2021
Polk Legend L800

Polk Legend L800

  • Product Name: L800 Floorstanding Loudspeaker
  • Manufacturer: Polk Audio
  • Performance Rating: StarStarStarStarStar
  • Value Rating: StarStarStarStarStar
  • Review Date: April 05, 2021 11:35
  • MSRP: $ 6,000/pr
  • Buy Now
  • Driver Enclosure Type: Power Port Bass Vented with Sealed Midrange
  • Tweeter:  (2)  1" (2.54 cm) d (Round) Pinnacle Ring Radiator
  • Mid-range Woofer: (2)  5.25" (13.34 cm) d (Round) Turbine Cone
  • Bass Drivers: (2)  10" (25.4 cm) d (Round) Woofer
  • Crossover: 3-way Orth Crossover (x2)
  • Midrange Woofer Crossover Frequency: 370 Hz
  • Tweeter Midrange Crossover Frequency: 2800 Hz
  • Power Handling per channel: 25 watts → 300 watts
  • Total Frequency Response: 25 Hz → 50,000 Hz
  • Nominal Impedance Range: 2.8 ohms → 4 ohms
  • Sensitivity (1 watt @ 1 meter): 87 dB
  • Lower and Upper -3dB Limits: 32 Hz → 38,000 Hz
  • Dimensions (HxWxD): 48.6" (123.44 cm) x 17.94" (45.57 cm) x 17.38" (44.15 cm)
  • Weight: 118 lbs (53.52 kg)
  • Warranty: 5-years non-transferable (additional 5-years upon product registration)



  • Phenomenal soundstage and imaging
  • Real deep bass extension down to 20Hz
  • Neutral tonality
  • Unique and interesting appearance


  • Needs single-ended amplifier for full SDA effect
  • Large and bulky


Polk Audio found enormous success with their former flagship loudspeaker line, the LSiM series, which were launched in early 2011. However, after nearly a decade, Polk thought it was time to refresh their top-of-the-line speakers. In late 2019, Polk launched their ‘Legend’ speaker line which supplanted the LSiM series. The announcement of the L800, the big dog of the ‘Legend’ series, caused a wave of excitement throughout the audio community. This excitement was not only due to the heavy-duty specs on the L800 but also the return of Polk’s SDA technology that Polk had left dormant for nearly 25 years. The L800 was by far the most ambitious loudspeaker that Polk had ever launched, not to mention the most expensive.

Polk Audio L800 SDA Tower Speakers YouTube Reviewb

The L800s deliver one of the best soundstages that you could ever hope to hear from any speaker set at any price.

At long last, we finally bring you our review of the L800 speakers. This is not a simple speaker, and that was one of the factors in the delay of this review (there was also a pandemic to contend with, a new addition to my family, and also a cross-country move, so life can get in the way of these things as well). The L800 is a unique and relatively complex design for a loudspeaker, but what it delivers is one of the best soundstages that you could ever hope to hear from stereo sound from any speaker set at any price. Its advantage is the SDA technology, updated and improved from its former incarnations, now dubbed the ‘SDA PRO.’ The SDA technology does have some catches though, such as some rather particular placement requirements, a strong preference for single-ended amplifiers, the need for an extra cable that joins the speakers, and a bit more treble than the highly neutral response that the L800s produce with the SDA disengaged. However, what we get for these trade-offs is a speaker that images like none other, regardless of price.

Packing and Appearance

PackingThe L800s were very well packed. They were double-boxed with thick polyethylene foam blocks giving them a good distance from the box walls. They were wrapped in a soft fabric bag to protect them from slight scuffs or scratches with an outer plastic back to protect them from moisture. With 150 lbs. shipping weight per speaker, unboxing them was an elaborate ritual unto itself as we demonstrated in our L800 Unboxing YouTube video. Once unpacked, we were met with a speaker with formidable presence (a fancy way of saying it’s a big ‘un). Polk has taken strong measures to make them as visually palatable as possible, and I think they do look pretty cool, but they are so large that they certainly wouldn’t be acceptable for everyone.

I should say here that when I say they look cool, I don’t mean to say they look elegant or gorgeous, which I don’t think they do. I think they look interesting and somewhat bold. Polk has tried to temper this with some rather traditional finish options where the user can have walnut side panels with a satin black front baffle or black ash side panels with a gloss black front baffle. These finishes are very nice and I would say furniture grade. They need to be furniture grade since the L800s are so large that they do have the presence of furniture. Without grilles, all of the drivers on the front baffle, especially across the SDA array, make the L800s look a bit busy compared to most speakers. The two 10” bass drivers give it a very beefy and capable appearance, and the SDA array makes it look like it could really rock the house, although, as we will discuss below, the outer set of drivers are there to eliminate sound, not add sound.

Polk Audio L800 Unboxing Overview

The grilles do a great job of muting the busy facade of the front baffle and make the L800s look rather stoic. They are magnetically attached, so there are no visible grille guides on the front baffle. One nice touch of visual flair is the dividing angle front baffle of the SDA array that the grilles carry all the way down the speaker. This slight wedge shape of the front baffle is not there for stylistic reasons, but rather practical concerns that I will explain later. However, I think it is the key ingredient in the neat look of these speakers. While this is an overall angular speaker, there are no hard edges since all of the edges have a slight rounding, and that certainly helps the L800s to look less aggressive than they could have, and that adds a touch of class to what might otherwise have been a bit more brutish appearance.

Design Analysis

L800MidTwtThe L800 has a lot going on. Even setting aside the SDA technology, there is much to distinguish it from other speakers in its class. In discussion with the L800’s engineering staff, I was told that the L800 was first designed to be the best speaker they know how to make. The SDA technology was then layered onto that speaker. Let’s talk about some of the more normal features that it employs to improve performance before we get into the SDA stuff. Its base design is a three-way tower speaker using 10” bass drivers, 5.25” midrange drivers, and 1” ring radiator tweeters. The drivers that it uses are all new and custom made for the Legend series. For a detailed discussion of these elements, let’s start at the top with the ring radiating tweeter. Polk has been using ring radiator tweeters for decades, and this iteration of their ring radiators, which they call the ‘Pinnacle Ring Radiator,’ is their most refined version yet of this tweeter type. Why go with a ring radiator and not the usual dome tweeter? I will quote from Audioholic’s review of the Legend L200 and L400 which uses these same components:

The way ring radiators work is that instead of having the voice coil former affixed to a dome as in traditional dome tweeters, the voice coil former is simply connected to two large soft ringed suspension pieces: an outer ring and an inner ring. The inner ring is connected to a stationary rod in the center that also holds that needle-looking phase plug. Whereas in normal dome tweeters, the acoustic radiating surface is the dome, in a ring radiator, the acoustic radiating surface is these two large suspension rings. Normally the suspension bits in drivers are used merely to hold an acoustic radiating surface in a manner where it only has one plane of travel, back and forth.

One of the advantages of ring radiators is that ‘break-up’ modes are pushed out to much higher frequencies versus typical dome tweeters. ‘Break-up’ modes are where the radiating surface, whether that be a dome, cone, or plane, loses its shape from playing frequencies so high that it bends only part of the surface instead of the entire surface. It can really hurt the sound quality from any speaker where it is not controlled. Another advantage is that ring radiators can easily play to ultrasonic frequencies since the soft suspension piece being driven is usually much lighter than traditional dome materials.

The midrange driver was also nicely explained in article:

...the midrange driver is a unique design in the Legend series. The cone is made out of foamed polymer and is peculiarly shaped such that Polk calls it the ‘Turbine Cone.’ The cone has seven fin-type protrusions that form a vortex pattern hence the name ‘turbine.’ The shape and number of these fins are claimed to make the cone stiffer which can drive break-up modes higher in frequency where they will be easier to filter out by the crossover circuit.

L800 FrontEach L800 uses two 10” bass drivers that are very capable. I like to listen to music and movies loud, and in my time with the L800s, I was never able to get them to bottom out or even hear any mechanical stress. The bass section of these speakers is so proficient that it would have made for a pretty good subwoofer in itself separate from the speaker. They use the same foamed cones as the midbass drivers and a large surround and are capable of much more air displacement than most speakers in its price class. Polk was able to use these large woofers since the speaker already had to be wide due to the SDA array, thereby allowing for larger and more serious bass drivers. For the lowest octave, these bass drivers charge a bottom-mounted port that Polk calls the ‘Power Port.’ Again, taking from the description from our previous Legend review:

“The idea behind the Power Port is that it preserves the laminar flow of air within the port by controlling its contact with the environment from a flared cone piece that is mounted over the port opening. This should protect against port turbulence at higher drive levels better than traditional port designs.”

For the L800, Polk calls the crossover design the ‘Orth’ crossover circuit, naming it after the lead designer at Polk, Scott Orth. The Orth crossover is not a crossover type so much as it is a set of guidelines that Mr. Orth likes to use in crossover design that is recounted in the design analysis section of the above-quoted L200/L400 review. The L800 crosses the bass drivers over to the midrange driver at 370Hz and goes from midrange driver to tweeter at 2.8kHz. The exact slope is not provided, but is said to be around 3rd order on the midrange and tweeter. Crossover parts were also not easily accessible, but it is my understanding that they are good quality for the money rather than cost no object. The crossover circuit would have to be very elaborate for a speaker of this complexity. The L800s have dual binding posts for bi-amping or bi-wiring options (we regard bi-wiring as ineffectual and don’t encourage it). While bi-amping is normally an excessive and unneeded feature on many loudspeakers meant for home audio, that is not the case for the L800s. With a specified 87dB sensitivity, these are not extraordinarily sensitive speakers, yet they can take a lot of power on account of the dual 10” bass drivers. Users could bi-amp these speakers and run the bass driver section on a really beefy amplifier, and the L800 can actually take advantage of that power unlike so many other home audio loudspeakers.

107L900B-polk-legend-900      L800 Rear

The cabinet is very stout with a network of internal bracing that includes a sealed compartment for the midrange drivers. There is a removable plate at the top which gives users the option to install an up-firing Atmos module. We didn’t receive an Atmos module, which must be purchased separately by users, and so we will not be covering that aspect of the L800, except to say that it looks like it could work somewhat better than most Atmos modules by virtue of being sunk in the cabinet so that less of the sound from the speaker will hit the user directly. Ideally, users will only want reflected sound to reach their ears from Atmos modules, not direct sound. The grilles are touted to be acoustically transparent by Polk. While no grille is truly acoustically transparent, the L800 grilles look like their acoustic effects would be insignificant for practical purposes given the minimal frame. Users have the option of using either spiked feet for carpeted surfaces or rubber feet for hard flooring. The 5-way binding posts are solid and high-quality. They use a wire jumper instead of a chunk of sheet metal like most other speakers. The overall build quality is very good, as one would expect from a loudspeaker at this price point.  

SDA Technology Overview

To put it simply, the SDA technology eliminates or reduces sound reaching the listener’s ear from the opposing side speaker, so that, for example, sound from the left speaker is not heard by the right ear. This improves the imaging ability of the sound system. To go into more detail, we are going to get a bit technical.

The above-mentioned effect of sound from one of the stereo channels reaching the opposite-side ear is called inter-aural crosstalk. In theory, you would want sound from the left speaker to only reach the left ear and right speaker to only reach the right ear. Inter-aural crosstalk is a distortion that “smears” the imaging in the sense that it makes the speakers themselves more localizable and thus restricts the sound image between the speakers. Headphones have no inter-aural crosstalk and so the headphones themselves can’t be localized, and this is why headphones have large spacious images. However the headphone sound is stuck inside the listeners head (a lack of externalization) and doesn’t sound very realistic. The reason for that is the sound from headphones bypasses many of the acoustic effects of our head, ears, and body. In addition, headphone sound doesn’t change with respect to head movement. Only extremely sophisticated headphone systems can overcome these flaws, and presently those only reside in laboratories (though are becoming increasingly common in less costly products). 

At this point, we might ask how much of a problem is inter-aural crosstalk in reality? Many of us have experienced great imaging from speakers that don’t have SDA technology, so how much of a difference has inter-aural crosstalk been shown to make? Of course, a lot of research has gone into recreating a soundscape more accurately, and one of the problems with 2-channel systems is that they contain various “distortions” that prevent the proper illusion. The biggest “distortion” preventing a 3D presentation of the soundscape is that the way in which the actual sound object is reproduced is not realistic, and one example is that the sound object is a virtual object created by a pair of speakers which radiate sound differently from how that actual sound object would. That radiation problem causes crosstalk between the ears and as such, you get a smeared reproduction of the sound object. In practice, we are used to this and it doesn’t destroy the effect, but that doesn’t mean it’s realistic or accurate.

There have been various measures over the past decades to reduce inter-aural crosstalk. Crosstalk cancellation and stereo expanders were popular in the 80’s, but many found the effect artificial (in reality, the effect is “more” realistic, but often introduced its own distortions). A problem with most of those crosstalk cancellers is that it requires a narrow listening window in order to hear the effect to its best advantage. One experiment, by Timothy Brock and Don Keele, eliminated inter-aural crosstalk by simply using a physical barrier that extended from between the speakers to the listener’s head. They note that this creates very realistic imaging which expands over a full 90 degrees, yet the speakers were very close together while still achieving a massive soundstage that is far beyond the confines of the speaker locations.

Crosstalk cancellation solutions have often been problematic in that they required unacceptable compromises in listening (sitting in only one perfect spot, large added barriers in a room, added sound colorations, etc.) The key is to understand that the love affair with crosstalk cancellation is not that it was a neat effect, but rather it was a search for more realistic imaging; what many call a fun effect is actually more realistic. The problem is that we aren’t all that bothered by the distortion since we are used to hearing reproduced sound that way, so we often perceive normal speakers as being “more” natural. It is only more natural in the sense that it is naturally what a pair of speakers does and is thus what we are used to. It is not more natural in the sense of how we locate real objects in space.

Polk’s Stereo Dimensional Array (SDA) addresses a real problem but may not be one that bothers many. The advantage of the SDA approach is that it does not lock you into a small optimal listening window. You can still move your head around and hear the effect. Furthermore, at the right listening distance, multiple listeners can enjoy the benefits without much loss of fidelity. The negative is that, like other systems, it does introduce a small but noticeable timbre distortion.

SDA is a kind of analog acoustic crosstalk cancellation. It uses speaker drivers placed precisely the distance between the average human ears on each cabinet to achieve crosstalk cancellation. The outer midrange driver and tweeter of each L800 speaker produces an inverted signal of the opposite speaker. This is an attempt to cancel out the sound of one of the speakers from reaching the opposite side ear. The cancellation method is similar to how active noise cancelling headphones work; generating a sound of the same amplitude but opposite phase negates the original sound. Polk’s new “Pro SDA” updates the original SDA by incorporating improvements including headshadow response, which allows the SDA cross-talk cancellation to be expanded into the treble region without serious interference problems. The Pro improvement adds a 15-degree baffle angle which helps narrow the speaker overall while also building in the toe angle needed for best sound. The new technology does a better job matching the true interaural crosstalk distortion created with most speakers and thus more completely cancels it.

Many will ask why this SDA technology is needed.  After all, if we listen to an instrument in a room, do not both ears hear that instrument, regardless of its placement?  Is this really a distortion we should be concerned with?  Keep in mind, first, not everyone agrees this is the right solution to the problem it is trying to solve.  Inter-aural crosstalk cancellation helps a speaker act more like a headphone allowing for the accurate reproduction of binaural recordings.  It works well with normal recordings as well, but with diminished effect.  The purpose is to more accurately recreate the original sense of space in the recording.  The crosstalk distortion tends to diminish our sense of space we hear from the recording and rely more on the room’s ability to reproduce that sense of space.  While some will argue this is a solution in search of a problem, others will argue it is solving a very important problem impacting the realistic reproduction of sound.  What do I think?  Decide for yourself after hearing them setup right. 

Setting up the L800

Slide1The L800s are an unusual speaker and so setting them up is also a bit unusual. Whereas many speakers are recommended to have the listener position form an equilateral triangle with the left and right speakers, the L800s work best when they are positioned much closer together than typical placements, so the speakers should be much closer together than you are from them. As an example, for a listening distance of 8’, a speaker spacing distance of 5’-6’ works best. For a distance of 10’, 7’-8’ apart might make the most sense. A certain minimum distance apart, say 4’-5’ seemed necessary, but placing the speakers farther apart did not widen the image, it simply ruined it. If you're able to listen at more than 10’-12’ back from the speakers, it may still make sense to try the speakers at a narrow 6’ to 8’ apart, and you might find the 6’ distance still sounds best. Moving the speakers farther apart, when at a sufficiently far listening distance, increases the optimal listening window and allows more people to enjoy good sound. However, the key is sufficient listening distance. While 8’ apart is enough to allow 3 people across to enjoy the imaging, you would need to be about 10’ to 12’ back at a minimum for this to work well.

Slide2The near wall placement and close distance apart makes these ideal speakers for many people’s homes where the speakers can be placed on either side of a TV pushed against a wall. This normally degrades imaging for normal speakers, but with the Polk L800s, it is ideal. They will recreate a giant image that extends beyond the walls of the room even in this placement (in fact, because of this placement). If the speakers are pushed too far apart, the image shrinks, and the inter-aural crosstalk cancelation is diminished. This near-wall placement also helps to reinforce low frequencies through boundary gain which strengthens bass.

The SDA speakers require sound from each speaker to be sent to the other speaker 180 degrees out of phase, and this is done via what Polk calls an ‘umbilical’ cord. Polk includes two umbilical cords that are each 12’ long. They can be connected together for a 24’ length which can be useful in case you need to route the cables around something. The cable is quite substantial and reminds me of those high-end audio cables with oversized jackets. The umbilical cords are probably better than they needed to be. The have a proprietary connect that utilizes a banana plug and jack on each side.  This would be difficult to DIY, so the factory cable is necessary.

use amplifiers with single-ended outputs for best SDA effect from the L800s.

One important set up point is that differential output amplifiers will not work as well with the SDA technology. The SDA feed comes from the positive leg of the speaker inputs. With single-ended amplifiers, that gives all of the difference signal, but with a differential amp, you only get half of the difference signal. We tested both and found better sound with single-ended amplifiers. Most modern Class D amplifiers have differential outputs and won’t work well, such as the Cherry Megachino I tried, the Hypex based amplifiers (including Marantz’s own Reference PM-10), various NAD amplifiers, etc. Most amplifiers in general are single-ended output so finding a good amplifier that works is not a big problem.  The best way to tell is to look at the back of the amplifier and see if it notes that the negative terminal of the amplifier cannot be connected to ground or if it is referred to as a balanced output or differential output amplifier.  If all else fails, ask the manufacturer.    

When the L800s were used in my room (11’ wide), we found the best sound was achieved using a lot of early reflection absorption. It seems the inter-aural crosstalk cancelation was negatively impacted by sidewall reflections. We confirmed this using binaural recordings. It suggests that if the speakers are within 3’ of the sidewalls, it may make good sense to add a lot of sidewall absorption. This can be achieved with purpose made acoustic panels, but thick curtains would do a similar job. Crosstalk cancelation happens over a limited and mostly mid to high frequency bandwidth.

Listening Sessions

Listening was done in my home theater room, which is 11’ by 25’. After much experimentation with placement, I found the best sound was when the speakers were separated by about five feet, with my listening position being eight feet away. The equipment used was primarily an Acurus A200 amplifier with a Cherry Dac Dac HS, using a laptop as the source. The media used was mostly streaming sources such as Qobuz, Tidal, and Amazon HD, but I also listened to some compact discs. For my music listening, I created a playlist of albums that were mixed or recorded in a way that could demonstrate the theoretical advantages of the L800s. I also played some more typical music just to see how the L800s fared on standard musical content.

107L800WN-polk-legend-800   107L800WN-polk-legend-800-down-firing

One album I listened to was ‘The Immaculate Collection’ by Madonna that had been remastered using QSound processing. Qsound is a filtering algorithm that creates binaural recordings of mono sources (meaning individual instruments or voices) that makes for a large, expansive soundstage. Some have criticized the album for the artificial nature of the QSound effect. However this effect, like SDA, is in fact “more real” in terms of object placement. Since the songs were not originally produced with QSound in mind, it is fair to say that it may not have been what the original artist and producer intented, though if they were involved in the remaster, it may also be described as a re-imagining of what the songs could have been.Qsound

The album changes the songs enough that it is not my favorite version, but the QSound effect is obvious and worked well with the SDA technology. Per the track ‘La Isla Bonita,’ as compared to the standard version, the harmonizing voices had a larger and more expansive sound coming from well beyond the speakers and giving a sort of ethereal quality to the song. A good anchoring bass line came through clear and tight; this is not a particularly bass rich song and Polks reflected that properly. A flamenco guitar had a nice center floating sound as if coming from just beyond Madonna. I found the sound of the guitar to be neutral and accurate. On the track ‘Like A Prayer,’ Madonna’s voice has a reverb effect and harmony that pulls her voice, over time, to the left of the image. On normal speakers this effect is barely noticeable. On headphones it is pronounced, and it was replicated accurately by the Polks. It had the effect of enlarging the sound and adding a great sense of space between the instruments and musicians.

Yosi HorikOne album that really shined on the L800s was ‘Wandering’ by musician and acoustic artist Yasi Horikawa. This is a binaural recording, meaning that it was recorded with a microphone set up in a dummy head that mimics human hearing, and this gives recordings a hyper-realistic effect that is eerie to listen to, especially with real objects. This album sounds merely ok through normal speakers, but most of the effect is lost. Headphones lock the image in your head, but the binaural effect is obvious. Using the Polk speakers, it was the first time I heard this album as it was meant to be heard, giving the same realistic binaural sound I hear over headphones but without the problems of the image being locked in my head. Instead, the image expanded over 180 degrees in front of me, expanding far beyond the boundaries of my wall. On the track ‘Bubbles,’ the sound of marbles falling on a hard surface creates a rhythm for the music while at the same time catching your attention to what sounds like actual giant marbles falling all around you. It’s hard to describe what this is like until you hear it. Listening to it through headphones gives you a sense, but it feels different when you hear it outside your head. Regular speakers simply can’t achieve this. As compared to other more conventional speakers, the imaging is different- more laser-focused and generally coming from between the speakers. The width of the image largely depended on how far the speakers were spread apart. The bouncing marbles were thus relegated to just between the speakers. And so on normal speakers, the depth was lost, the size became smaller, and the effect no longer sounded real. Cool sure, but not the same.

The 50th anniversary remaster of the Rolling Stones’ ‘Let It Bleed’ features some very vivid stereophonic effects, and I thought this would make for a good demo of what the L800s could do. For example, the track ‘Country Honk’ starts with a car driving by and honking. Through my typical reference speakers, the effect was best described as normal; it sounded real, I suppose, as much as any normal speaker can sound real in this regard. However, I didn’t sit up and think, hey there is a car in my room. With the Polks, I was honestly startled by the hyper-real sound of the car. While I knew there wasn’t a car in my room, it really had that kind of presentation. The song has a great rhythm that makes you want to tap your foot along. I’ve heard it so often before that I don’t get into it as much as I used to. I recognize it as a great song, but I’ve simply played too much. Yet through the Polks, I felt like I was hearing it again for the first time. I can’t explain why, beyond the special imaging, but I found myself relistening to a lot of my favorite music without feeling like it was played out. This was just one of many examples where that was true.

WilliamsTo see how the L800s dealt with orchestral music, I listened to the album ‘Celebrating John Williams,’ which is performances of John Williams compositions by the Los Angeles Philharmonic Orchestra led by Williams’ friend Gustavo Dudamel. This high-resolution recording was released in May of 2019 on the Deutsche Grammophon label. Through my reference speakers, the soundstage of this album was large and expansive, and the instruments were layered in a realistic way. At the same time, I would say it didn’t sound real to me. The narrow directivity and highly specific imaging that that creates has always caused symphonies to sound artificial. You simply can’t hear image placement that well in a real symphonic hall. In addition, while the image was large and expansive, that is caveated by the fact that it was still limited to the confines of the room. It never sounded like it was realistically large, but I don’t find most any speaker able to realistically portray what an actual symphony sounds like in real life. However, through the Polks, I found the imaging much more realistic. The size was larger than my room, and with the lights off I felt I couldn’t tell I was in my room anymore. It easily expanded beyond the confines of the walls, let alone the speakers themselves. Symphonies often have solid bass down to at least 50hz, with some instruments producing sound even lower than this. Often quite loud! The Polks had such good bass that, when paired with a powerful amplifier, they sounded realistic in size and dynamics. This recording also exposed the shortcomings of weak amps. The dynamics of the music often stressed the small amps built into receivers when trying to play back at realistic levels.

no other speaker presents Pink Floyd music and style of mixing more accurately than the L800s.

I listened to a lot of Pink Floyd, naturally, since their characteristic stereophonic effects were something that I thought the L800s would be a great fit for. One of many examples of how well the L800s rendered Pink Floyd came on the track ‘Time’ from ‘The Dark Side of the Moon.’ The sound of clock ticks came from all around the 180-degree hemisphere in front of me. I won’t exaggerate, as some reviewers have, and suggest it sounded like it came from all around me. It doesn’t do that (and the science behind inter-aural crosstalk cancelation suggests it shouldn’t and that it only impacts the sound from in front of you). Still, the effect was to present the recording in a new and different way from what I am used to. It was best described as listening to a giant pair of headphones. It wasn’t stuck in my head, but it also wasn’t stuck between a pair of speakers. The drumbeat that moves around the stage normally sounds like it is coming from just between the speakers. This gave the impression that the drums expanded out beyond my room's boundaries - a very cool effect that added to the musical presentation. The Polk L800s were seemingly made for Pink Floyd; no other speaker presents their music and style of mixing so accurately.

The L800s can bring out new aspects of older recordings that can make them engaging to give a relisten. One example of that is the HD remaster of Ray Charles’ ‘Hallelujah I Love Her So.’ On the track ‘I’ve Got a Woman Live,’ the recording starts with audience applause. It should sound like it’s coming from all around but normally sounds like it’s coming well in front of you and between the speakers. Through the Polks, it sounds like it’s coming from around you, though it primarily still sounds like it is at or in front of you but not in an artificial manner. The perspective shifts from as if you are on a balcony listening in with the audience in front of you to sounding like you are there as part of the audience. The imaging of the recording is nothing special, with Ray positioned fairly hard to the left, playing piano, and his orchestra more center and to the right. Through normal speakers, this can sound a bit artificial, again, typically constrained between the speakers or just about where the speakers are at. Through the Polks this took on a different quality with it now sounding more like Ray was playing piano to the far left of the stage, far outside the confines of the speakers or room. Again, the Polks had this unusual and uncanny ability to cause the room boundaries to disappear. I think this is why I liked relistening to my old favorites so much.

I could go on with many more examples of how the L800s separate themselves from typical speakers, so I will just sum up their overall character from my experience. Firstly, they have the best and most realistic imaging I have ever heard, with the right music. The effect was strongest with binaural recordings, but any recording with a sophisticated use of stereo soundstaging stands to benefit. The SDA effect added noticeable timbre coloration, but wasn’t obvious on all music and often wasn’t offensive. The sound was alluring, causing me to revisit my music library for hours on end. These are very enjoyable speakers to listen to, even with their imperfections, and I wanted to listen to them more than other speakers. While they played plenty loud, they sometimes felt dynamically constrained. They seemed to need a powerful amp to sound their best. I should say at this point that I like to listen to music and movies at louder levels than most people. The L800s have more than enough dynamic range for the vast majority of people - with enough amplification. They were capable of loud deep bass, which sounded very good. However, they need big amps to achieve their full potential. They sounded noticeably constrained in bass with small receivers.

About the author:

Matthew has spent the better part of the last two decades studying acoustics and good sound reproduction. He provides down to earth explanations of complex scientific topics related to audio reproduction.

View full profile

Confused about what AV Gear to buy or how to set it up? Join our Exclusive Audioholics E-Book Membership Program!

Recent Forum Posts:

Golfx posts on April 11, 2021 13:31
Matthew J Poes, post: 1474874, member: 85392
I didn’t have matching surround speakers or a matching center to try. My HT setup relied on differential output amplifiers. I had set these up as a separate system in the room.

I now have the matching center and plan to set them up for surround use. It should be compatible. Polk is certainly selling them this way and tested it themselves. I just didn’t have the ability at the time of the review period.

You will enjoy the L400. I use it in a 7.2.4 system with the L800s.
Matthew J Poes posts on April 11, 2021 13:12
ski2xblack, post: 1474883, member: 9107
I would like to see evidence relating to these Polks, not the quite different approch of another comany.
If you are so sure this is some kind of scam feel free to get it yourself. Those approaches are not so different. If you actually read the half dozen papers you would see that this is a sound approach and that it’s very difficult to accurately measure. Why is it my responsibility to obtain the more than half a million dollars in equipment and facilities to back up claims already backed up by plenty of research?

did you look at the basic XTC formula in the Princeton paper prior to their introduction of the timbre adjustment filter? Their basic starting point is the same L-R plus the delay between the ears. Identical to what Polk has done passively. They then add in additional filters to maintain high XTC while not corrupting the timbre.
Matthew J Poes posts on April 11, 2021 13:08
Golfx, post: 1474876, member: 93641
Why should he provide supporting evidence to you? Instead, You are the one who should be providing peer reviewed journal articles to counter the review premise.
It wouldn’t be unreasonable to expect me to provide some proof in the form of peer reviewed articles. Which I did.

I do have measurements of the ILD with the crosstalk cancelation filters on vs off. The problem is that it wasn’t taken correctly as I didn’t have a HATS. It corrupted them by not having a true head shadow. Further, they look consistent with the ones Princeton researchers produced, which means they are very messy. I rely on their expertise to know it’s right, but basically the difference analysis you use ends up mostly showing the comb filtering, so it’s very rough.
ski2xblack posts on April 11, 2021 13:06
Matthew J Poes, post: 1474873, member: 85392
But let’s also consider that I already linked to half a dozen papers explaining crosstalk cancelation circuits and providing evidence. They work with a difference signal as well. They simply use DSP to feed it into the main speakers instead. This is what BAACH does. Why not just look to them for evidence. You seem skeptical but I don’t get why.
I would like to see evidence relating to these Polks, not the quite different approch of another comany.

Maybe it's the bee's knees, maybe it's just kooky, unconventional spatial effects. You said yourself that this is all in pursuit of an illusion, and one man's kooky spatial effects are another's audio nirvana. There is no right or wrong there. But this is reductive science, so querries into what these speakers are actually doing and the manufacturer claims are fair game.
Golfx posts on April 11, 2021 12:50
ski2xblack, post: 1474852, member: 9107
Never said there was.

Yes, that is the claim. If it's really that simple, supporting evidence should be easy to produce. I'm sure you'll get right on that.

While we wait for either verification or falsifying evidence, lets consider the following. For wave cancellation to take place, the waveforms must be identical and out of phase. But the signals in use here are far from identical. The ambient arrays are indeed 180 deg. out of phase with each other, which is why you hear that wide, disembodied diffuse sound that expands beyond the speakers physical locations. This is nothing new or unexpected. Any pair of speakers playing the L - R signal out of phase do this, regardless of their proximity to other speakers.
Why should he provide supporting evidence to you? Instead, You are the one who should be providing peer reviewed journal articles to counter the review premise.
Post Reply