AOC Q2963PM Conclusion
The biggest "problem" if you want to call it that with the AOC Q2963PM is the price. For $500, you can get two smaller displays and put them side by side. Sure, it isn't one, ultra-wide display, but it will probably cost you less than $500. For example, if you just use the 16:9 with a 1080p input, you end up with an image that is 23.75" diagonal. Right now, AOC's own 24" e2460Sd will run you less than $150 on Amazon (the MSRP is $190). Two will cost you less than the price of the Q2963PM and you'll have much more screen space. It's hard to see why someone would spend that much on an ultra-wide display.
But if you crave the newest "coolest" display, the AOC Q2963PM might be for you. It might also make sense if you can't have two displays or for other reasons that I can't seem to come up with. From a performance standpoint, the AOC Q2963PM does well. It scored admirably on the HQV tests, the Picture-by-Picture works well even if it does require a bit of resolution maintenance on your part for optimum functionality, it is bright and clear and virtually without glare, and it certainly is very wide. Perhaps this enough for some buyers.
AOC Q2963PM 29" Ultra Widescreen Monitor
MSRP $499.99
The Score Card
The scoring below is based on each piece of equipment doing the duty it is designed for. The numbers are weighed heavily with respect to the individual cost of each unit, thus giving a rating roughly equal to:
Performance × Price Factor/Value = Rating
Audioholics.com note: The ratings indicated below are based on subjective listening and objective testing of the product in question. The rating scale is based on performance/value ratio. If you notice better performing products in future reviews that have lower numbers in certain areas, be aware that the value factor is most likely the culprit. Other Audioholics reviewers may rate products solely based on performance, and each reviewer has his/her own system for ratings.
Audioholics Rating Scale
— Excellent
— Very Good
— Good
— Fair
— Poor
Metric | Rating |
---|---|
Detail and Resolution | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Deinterlacing & Scaling | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Contrast and Black Levels | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Color Reproduction | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Noise Reduction | ![]() |
Calibration Options | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Build Quality | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Ergonomics & Usability | ![]() ![]() |
Ease of Setup | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Features | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Fit and Finish | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Performance | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Value | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Confused about what AV Gear to buy or how to set it up? Join our Exclusive Audioholics E-Book Membership Program!
Recent Forum Posts:
AOC Q2963PM Monitor Review: 2560x1080 Is A New Way To Play - AOC Q2963PM Offers A New Way To Work
And heck yea, I'd rather buy 3 16:9 monitors for same money, for example this one ASUS VS239H-P Black 23" 5ms (GTG) HDMI Widescreen LED Monitor 250 cd/m2 ASCR 50,000,000:1, IPS Panel - Newegg.com