“Let our rigorous testing and reviews be your guidelines to A/V equipment – not marketing slogans”
Facebook Youtube Twitter instagram pinterest

What is Wire / Cable Gauge (AWG)?

By

gauge of wiresWire gauge is a measurement of the size of the wire based upon its cross-sectional area; although some sources will show metric wire gauge sizes, the usual method of notation in the US is "American Wire Gauge," or AWG.  In AWG, the size of a wire is expressed on a base-ten logarithmic scale where the larger the AWG, the smaller the wire is--so that, for example, a 30 AWG wire is ten times as large in cross-section as a 40 AWG wire, and one-tenth as large as a 20 AWG wire.

Since resistance, at DC, is directly proportional to wire cross-sectional area, the AWG scale likewise tells us that a 10 AWG wire will have one-tenth the resistance of a 20 AWG wire, and so on.  Since resistance converts electrical energy to heat energy, the size of a wire determines, for a given electrical flow, how much heat the wire will have to dissipate, and this obviously has a direct bearing upon electrical safety because as the wire becomes quite hot, the insulation will deform, melt, or even combust--and, if we crank the current high enough, the wire itself will melt.  Electrical codes, like the NEC ("National Electrical Code," in use in most USA jurisdictions), limit how much current can be carried in a wire of a given size because the failure of wire or of its insulation increases the hazards of fire and shock. 

Our current discussion and the tables below deal with copper wire because copper is overwhelmingly the most common material used in power cords.  Silver is marginally more conductive but is problematic when used as wire because it is somewhat brittle, cannot be annealed, and is quite expensive; other metals like aluminum are sometimes used but are less conductive (i.e., more resistive) and therefore need to be used in larger gauge sizes.

For detailed analysis on cables, read: What Matters Most in Speaker Cables?

 Cable Gauge vs Resistance

Cable Resistance vs Gauge

As you can see the lower the cable gauge, the less resistive loss a power cable will cause.  Now, as noted above, how important resistance is will depend heavily upon the load being driven, with a small high-impedance load and its low current draw placing very little demand on the cord, while a large low-impedance load will cause a large current flow and consequently a comparatively high resistive loss in the power cable.

People sometimes make the mistake of thinking of the power cable as limiting the current available to the device it feeds in an absolute sense--that is, as though a power cord designed to take 14 amps will take 14 amps and no more.  In fact, the limitations upon amperage, often referred to as "ampacity," which we see marked on products or in spec sheets are not absolute limits--it is, indeed, possible to push a tremendous amount of current through a 14 AWG wire, up until the point when the heat generated melts the wire and breaks the circuit (the "fusing" current).  What statements about "ampacity" really mean is that, according to some set of criteria established by code or by an organization such as UL, a given current flow is considered safe for a certain gauge of wire.  Going to a larger gauge (smaller AWG number) will always reduce resistance, and will reduce the voltage drop between the wall socket and the power supply input, but in most cases this will be of no consequence if the power cord is adequately sized relative to safety considerations.  Exceptions would include cases where a power cord is abnormally long (e.g., a power amplifier is being run on a 100-foot extension cord of minimum acceptable gauge; the cord is safe because it can easily dissipate the heat given off over its entire length, but the resistance of the cord is abnormally high because of its great length) or where a power supply has been poorly designed and is intolerant of small voltage drops.

The ampacity limits based upon safety concerns, for flexible power cords, are set out in the NEC and, for most cord types, are as indicated per the graph below:

 Gauge vs Ampacity

Ampacity vs Gauge

These go higher still, but since most branch circuits in residential installations are overcurrent-protected at  no more than 20 amps, they become of little relevance to consumer audio and video (important, though, if you're installing a clothes dryer!).  These AWG sizes should be adequate, in the vast majority of applications, not only to maintain safety but also to provide adequate current to prevent any adverse impact upon audio and video quality. 

Electrical Safety

One important way in which power cords differ from audio and video cables is that power cords carry hazardous voltages and currents.  An audio interconnect might carry a one-volt signal, while your power main carries (in the US) more than a hundred volts of AC, and is capable of delivering lethal current at that voltage.  Not only is the power hazardous to human life directly, but it poses a very real potential fire hazard--shorts, arcing, and excessive heat all can lead to a house fire, and it's very important to be sure that a power cord is safely designed. 

UL listing is probably the best reference a power cable can have; it indicates that the cable not only is made from appropriate materials, but that the assembly itself, as an integrated whole, has been shown to comply with UL standards for fire safety.  There are many exotic power cords that don't carry a UL listing.  Some may meet UL standards but the manufacturer has not wanted to invest in UL testing; but others are not tested simply because they would not meet the applicable standards.  Sometimes the problems are inherent in the design.  For example, it's hard to build a shielded power cord which meets UL standards because shielding tends to reduce heat dissipation. 

Fire kills, and shock kills, too.  For these reasons we strongly recommend the use of UL-listed power cords. 

What About These Claims for Exotic Cords?

It's hard to characterize all of the strange claims associated with power cords, and some of the claims are so vague that they're hard to understand, much less critique.  The one which is commonly made and which comes closest to making just a bit of sense is noise rejection, so we'll talk about that here. 

Improved Noise Rejection

power transmissionIt's often said that a high-end power cord will help reject noise, keeping a system's "noise floor" low and therefore providing a cleaner sound, by virtue either of superior shielding or twist geometry.   This sort of claim ignores two critical considerations.  First, the power cord simply is not often a source of noise introduction, and if the amp has a properly-designed power supply it should be well-nigh impossible to get noise into the system through the power cord.  The transformer, in particular, with its extremely high inductance, tends to act as a strong choke against high-frequency noise.  Second, even if the few feet of power cord between the wall and amp were acting as an antenna to pick up induced noise, superior noise rejection in those few feet would do little to no good when the installed wiring in the wall, back through the service panel, and up the street to the next transformer in the line is not shielded against noise at all.  In other words, there may be hundreds of feet of exposed power line between that last transformer and your power supply; shielding, twisting, or otherwise treating the last six feet of cable for superior noise rejection makes very little difference to the exposure of the line to noise.

In the highly unusual situation where high-frequency noise is somehow making its way into the signal path through a power cord entry point, the likeliest solution to the problem would be simply to try to choke it at  the entry point; a ferrite choke clamped to the outside of the power cord near the amplifier end, for example, might do this.  Here again, however, we are talking about what may be a five-dollar, not a five-hundred-dollar or higher, solution.    

Better Sound

Outside of noise rejection, what we most often see in performance claims for power cords is vague language describing subjective experience of the sound.  These sorts of claims tend to be along the lines of "improved sonic coherency" and the like.  Claims of this sort are awfully hard to pin down, simply because it's not easy to define what's being claimed, and the power of suggestion is quite hard to resist -- if a listener is convinced that a power cord will make his sound more "coherent," whatever precisely that may mean, it likely will sound more "coherent" to him when that cord is in use, if he knows it's being used.  The protocol for pinning something like this down is, of course, experimental double-blind testing, and for whatever reason, the audiophile community seems to dislike double-blind testing with a passion. 

Unfortunately, of course, it's that distaste for objective testing which makes these arguments drag on forever.  If we can agree upon specific testing protocols, we can agree on what sort of result indicates that a listener can hear the difference between two things, and once we know that the subjective result is real and not merely the product of suggestion, the next stage in engineering the best product is to figure out exactly what physical phenomenon is the cause of the change in subjective experience.  Without objective guidance, it's not only hard to know whether a phenomenon is real, but it's also hard to know how to accurately characterize, understand, and design for it.  Without a doubt, if we knew how to build a power cord that would improve the sound of every system it was attached to, we'd be deeply committed to the pursuit of the best power cords in the world, but there are good reasons in principle to doubt, and little evidence in practice to confirm, that any such Philosopher's Stone cable exists, or can exist. 

One thing that is fair to say is that if a cord could, in some particular application, make the sound more "coherent" or "clean" or "musical" or "splunge," the effect would as likely as not be highly idiosyncratic.  One could not assume that conditions of power delivery which made for greater "coherence" on one amp would be the same conditions which resulted in such an effect on another.  We can say dependably that, for example, some large amount of capacitance on an interconnect in a system with known impedances will cause a certain amount of rolloff of high frequencies, but we can't really dependably tell what, say, subtly altering the waveform of the incoming power -- if indeed a power cord were shown to do that -- would do.  It might well affect the sound of some amp while not affecting others, and might affect the sound of two different amps very differently, depending upon their power-handling characteristics.  The vastly greater likelihood, however, is that anecdotally-observed differences between power cords have more to do with psychology than with engineering.

So, are People who Hear Differences Between Power Cords Crazy or Stupid?

Krusty the ClownArguments about cable seem to make people awfully angry, and there is a tendency in these arguments for people to up the ante by assuming that those who assert that there are no benefits to be had from boutique products are, implicitly, asserting that the proponents of those products are stupid, dishonest, crazy, or, worst, deaf.  So, let's be clear: not only are those who believe in these sorts of fancy-schmancy power cords NOT deaf, stupid, dishonest or crazy, but we'll go one further: we believe that they hear what they say they hear.  We simply don't believe that the differences they hear objectively exist.

Listening is a funny thing.  It is, like taste or smell, something that our brains do with information from the outside world.  Importantly, it is indeed in our brains, not in our ears, where mysterious things like "enjoying music" actually happen.  Our ears may report to the brain exactly what they hear, but the brain really never hears the same darned thing twice.  If you listen to a track, and then are asked to listen again but pay close attention to the oboe player, you don't merely listen to it differently; you actually hear it differently.  Your ears receive the same vibrations, but your brain does not do the same things with it.  As the synthesis of neurology and psychology continues, these things are being studied more and more--hence the field now known as "psychoacoustics" which studies not just how our ears work but how we hear. 

Our expectations, our moods, our volition, our personalities--all of these are a part of our experience of listening to music, and even a trained critical listener can have a very, very difficult time telling when something has changed.  As a result, those interested in truly, scientifically isolating the impact of particular pieces of equipment and studying them use trained listeners in blind testing.  Harman-Kardon, in particular, has invested heavily in listening laboratories, which are genuinely useful for studying the impact of things like speaker choice and placement. 

Listening is subjective, but the rigorous study of listening must, of necessity, be objective.  It's not hard to see how psychology inserts itself into the non-blind "auditioning" of high-end power cords, and far from denying the validity of anyone's experience, we are inclined to think that those who believe in these products do hear what they think they hear.  The question, however, from an engineering perspective, and the question from the perspective of a person asking whether these products will confer any value to him is not what others subjectively experience, but what the impact upon the actual, physical sound is, and there just is no good basis for thinking that high-end power cords do, or can, improve the sound of an audio playback system.    

Conclusion: Keep it Simple

It's clear that a well-made power supply is made to run well off of the current that comes from the wall socket, and that no power cord of reasonable design and gauge does anything to that current which is of any interest at all from an audio quality standpoint, testimonials and subjective experience to the contrary notwithstanding.  This does not mean that power cords are irrelevant to audio and video quality in every case, but it does mean that there is very little that a power cord needs to do to deliver flawless performance, and it does mean that exotic designs and materials are wholly irrelevant to whether it does so. 

What should one look for in a power cord?  There are a few things:

  • Mechanical reliability -- a sturdy design guards against intermittency and is always an aid to safety;
  • UL Listing -- there is no better assurance of a cord being well-designed against the hazards of shock and fire, when used for current levels within its rated limits; and
  •  Adequate Gauge -- a power cord should not cause significant voltage drops at the load and should not run the risk of starving the power supply for current at peak demand.

None of these things, however, should cost an arm and a leg.  When you see extraordinary claims made for power cords, it's time to step back and look for something simple, sturdy, well-sized and UL Listed at a reasonable price. 

Article Epilogue

While many exotic cable companies sell a nice story in attempt to convince unwary consumers that their products are better than their competition, we appreciate the candor Blue Jeans Cable always exhibits.  In a market flooded with questionable claims, overhyped and overpriced products, it's refreshing to find a company that doesn't follow such a business model.  Truth has become a marketable commodity and as long as Blue Jeans Cables continues to produce quality affordable products without the marketing nonsense, they will continue to be our #1 recommended cable manufacturer to our readers.  Kudo's to Blue  Jeans Cables and to our readers for educating themselves and steering clear of the marketing nonsense others like to spew as religion.  As long as you remember our mantra, "only poorly designed cables can be sonically distinguishable" or "properly designed cables are sonically indistinguishable" when shopping cables, you will never make a bad purchasing decision.   We leave it up to the reader to decide if they can't trust a cable manufacturer or A/V review publication on a topic as simple as power cords, how they can trust them on more important things such as hardware product reviews or complex subject matter related to home theater and technology.

Many thanks to Blue Jeans Cables for co-authoring this much needed article regarding Power Cables.

 

Confused about what AV Gear to buy or how to set it up? Join our Exclusive Audioholics E-Book Membership Program!

Recent Forum Posts:

highfigh posts on October 20, 2021 09:44
Pogre, post: 1511404, member: 79914
Aka musclewood! At least how it was known locally where I grew up in rural PA.

Sometimes known as Hornbeam- they used it for making hand planes, marking gauges and other handles for woodworking and that stuff lasts forever. I have some hand planes from the 1800s and one from the late-1700s and they're still in great condition.
Pogre posts on October 20, 2021 09:28
highfigh, post: 1511402, member: 36433
Never heard of Ironwood?
Aka musclewood! At least how it was known locally where I grew up in rural PA.
highfigh posts on October 20, 2021 09:26
Pogre, post: 1508112, member: 79914
It looks like a boa constrictor that just ate a goat!

That's just fuckin ridiculous…

Black Mamba.
highfigh posts on October 20, 2021 09:25
Verdinut, post: 1508134, member: 80194
You didn't know that it was a magnetic wood floor!

Never heard of Ironwood?
lovinthehd posts on October 03, 2021 23:12
NINaudio, post: 1508130, member: 82928
Now just imagine that was ALL just copper, then you'd be getting close. lol

Then the cost might make a tiny bit more sense….
ryanosaur, post: 1508108, member: 86393
wow… those are so pretty, I sure hope he never let's them touch the floor.



I especially like the little ladder to help keep it from being pulled from the wall receptacle …
Post Reply