“Let our rigorous testing and reviews be your guidelines to A/V equipment – not marketing slogans”
Facebook Youtube Twitter instagram pinterest

Comcast to Offer 800 HD Channels? Not.

by June 13, 2007
Comcast Muffs Definition of "HD Channels"

Comcast Muffs Definition of "HD Channels"

In response to the DirecTV announcement that it will have 100 HD channels by 2008, Comcast has retorted that it will have 400 "channels" in HD by 2008, and 800 by end of that year. While this all sounds like a fantastic opportunity for consumers to benefit from corporate competition it's important to understand that certain "definitions" are being changed on the part of Comcast in order to show that they can compete in this arena of emerging high definition programming.

Comcast is confusing issues with a global redefinition of the term HD "channel" by inserting the word "choice"). What this means is that, as far as Comcast is concerned, any HD program available on an On-Demand system constitutes a "channel choice". Asphinctersayswhat? A "channel choice" to Comcast is, apparently, the same as a real HD channel with multiple sources of programming.

Let's put this into an example to understand the redefinition and what it means to consumers. If you select a movie from an HD On-Demand channel using Comcast, you are selecting from one of their 100 hours of HD VOD (Video On Demand). To Comcast, this constitutes an HD "Channel Choice". So as far as they are concerned they have over 50 HD Channels already - you can see how this is easily blown into the realm of make-believe. Contrast this with DirecTV's announcement, who lists "agreements in principle" with the following networks for HD programming: A&E, National Geographic, Bravo, NFL Network, Cartoon Network, SciFi Channel, CNN, Speed, Food Network, TBS, FX, The History Channel, HGTV, The Weather Channel, MTV, and USA Network. I may have to switch to satellite if the Sci-Fi Channel actually goes HD...

This begs the question: "Does Comcast have a clue what it's talking about and where is this all going?" Well, we're not sure, but the source article at TVPredictions.com seems to indicate that at least one person down in the Comcast PR department needs to have their head examined. Consumers aren't dumb and trying to make apples-to-oranges comparison on HD programming does nothing to help consumers decide for themselves which service provides better material and choices.

darien87 posts on June 18, 2007 14:53
F Comcast man. I hate them with a passion! We're paying about $80 a month for digital HD cable with a DVR. There's only about 20 HD channels from them right now, so we're EXTREMELY limited in the amount of HD content we can watch. Plus I swear they raise their rates every year!!

As soon as we move out of our condo and get a real house, I'm dumping their *** as fast as I can!!!
zappman720 posts on June 18, 2007 14:48
What's the difference?

I have Comcast digital HD cable and I love it. Why does it matter if you have one (HD OnDemand) or a zillion dedicated channels, you can only watch one at a time. With Comcast I choose what I want when I want. Channels just become catagories. If Comcast can deliver on one channel what a dish can do with 50+, who cares as long as you are getting a quality feed?
avaserfi posts on June 13, 2007 14:04
Sounds to me like comcast is using the very sleazy tactic of taking advantage of consumers who know little to nothing about high definition. As seen by previous articles the majority of consumers have high def sets but do not even realize they are still receiving standard def. Looks like comcast is just trying to swing those people in their favor by boosting their numbers etc…

There should just be PSA's on TV to teach all these people, then problems like this wouldn't arise.
Post Reply
About the author:
author portrait

Clint Deboer was terminated from Audioholics for misconduct on April 4th, 2014. He no longer represents Audioholics in any fashion.

View full profile