Aperion Audio Bravus 10D Subwoofer Review
Summary
- Frequency Response: -3dB -- 30Hz - 180Hz
- Amplifier Power: 300W
- Woofer: Dual 10" High Excursion Aluminum Cones
- Driver Configuration: Dual Active Drivers Enclosure
- Type: Sealed and Internally Braced 1" HDF
- Dimensions: 15"H x 13.5" W x 13.5" D (with feet attached)
- Weight: 44 Lbs
Executive Overview
The Aperion Bravus 10D is an attractive, potent little subwoofer at a reasonable price. It certainly doesn't have the output and extension of its larger peers but that's a tradeoff for a smaller box that blends more easily into your room décor. In that respect, the Bravus 10D excels. It's beautiful to look at and makes it hard to not justify putting two of these subs in your theater room - something we highly recommend.
Editor's Note: Be sure to also check out our full review of the Aperion Audio Bravus 10D Subwoofer with measurements.
The Bravus 10D is in the middle of the Aperion line of subwoofers. You can order it in two finishes: cherry, shown here, or high gloss black. Both are stunning and the quality of the finish is second to none - in fact it's a higher quality look and feel than any other subwoofer in the market at this price. One standout feature is that the cabinet is rounded with NO sharp corners. Aperion also supplies both rubber and metal feet, so you're good to go on carpet, wood or tile.
The 10D features dual anodized black 10" Aluminum cone woofers with butyl rubber surrounds. They fire on opposing sides, which allows them to cancel out one another's stress on the cabinet. Aperion specs the cabinet as being constructed out of 1" HDF and we found that it was well-braced. The woofers are recessed into the cabinet so the grills end up being flush with the box. It's a great look, but if you want to pull the grills off, you will need to use their supplied tool. The 10D also comes with a remote control which is very rare at this price.
Now the woofers do have stamped baskets but they are made well. The drivers are NOT magnetically shielded but having two back to back nets the same result. We still wouldn’t recommend setting this sub on top of your CRT television... (pause)... for various reasons.
The 10D uses a 300 watt BASH amplifier. The back panel has both speaker level and line level inputs. There's a voltage selector and a power on/off switch. There are no speaker level outputs so you can't use the sub as a crossover for satellite speakers, for that you'll need to use an A/V receiver which we recommend anyway.
That remote we mentioned earlier? It's neat, but more for preset switching and volume, since it's virtually impossible to read the sub's LCD screen from across the room. Since there are no knobs, using the sub's onboard software is the only way to change Crossover and phase settings. It also lets you configure the preset modes and 1-band parametric EQ. Speaking of that PEQ, you get 6dB of gain or cut from 30Hz to 60Hz in 10Hz steps, and you can set the Q, or filter width to "Narrow", "Normal" or "Wide". This is helpful for lowering an out-of-control bass peak in your room.
We actually measured the 10D outdoors and also in-room. Running the Aperion sub up to its max output, it hit a whopping 115dB SPL at 1 meter at around 80Hz. Obviously, the bass response sharply fell off below 40Hz and the sub seems to go down to around 30Hz before it really drops out. The Bravus 10D integrated well with several brands of speakers and never sounded boomy, no matter how hard we drove it. It also never bottomed out -a testimony to Aperion's design philosophy. Aperion Audio has combined good driver design with an attractive cabinet at a reasonable price. You can get more output from a bigger box, but that's a different product then, isn't it? We can easily recommend the Bravus 10D for small to medium sized rooms. That recommendation goes double if you buy two.
Editor's Note Part Deux: Based in part on our testing and feedback,. Aperion Audio changed up the Bravus 10D and released the Bravus II 10D which features an active down-firing driver and two passive 10-inch radiators. The result is greater output, which overcoms one of the chief limitations of the original Bravus line.
Unless otherwise indicated, this is a preview article for the featured product. A formal review may or may not follow in the future.
GranteedEV, post: 791375
so they respond well to constructive criticism and you criticize their capability? The old bravus was a high output and punchy sub. For a lot of music that is something many people really like.
they went with passive radiators instead of two active drivers, whoch gives it more low end as Gene pointed out is more desired, at least for home theater. it likely reduces the midbass output capability by a solid 4-6 db on the other hand. it might measure better and technically sound better but who knows if it appeals to the masses better?
both are valid design choices when the desired end result is more than just making the best no compromise sub. there is more to it than just knowing what works. it is about actually selling the product, and aperion is obviously trying to differentiate their sub so that it isnt just the same driver/port box as everyone else.
If their old design was so good maybe they should offer 2 variations. Many companies offer more than one choice but maybe tis new one mates with all of their mains. I do commend them for trying to “fit in” obviously the old design was not met with lots of praise or it would most likely be offered still.
Anyhow I know I came across as bashing Aperion but honestly their 1st product was underwhelming and hopefully this new one offers a better performance for the coin. Spec wise there are some others who match it in $ but who knows.
Did Aperion actually re-designed this based on the review/suggestion from Audioholics? If so I give credit to Audioholics!
I can't say that I would even consider owning a product which designs and manufactures speaker (hey that's all they do) and make extreme design changes based on the comment from a reviewer, that's just plain getting PWND.
They design, test, manufacture and sell a product that just was not a good idea in the 1st place based on enclosure size? Come on give me a break.
Most manufacturers take our review criticism seriously. Yamaha for example has made many changes in model replacements as a direct result of our comments. I don't need anyone to give me credit. My goal is for manufacturers to make better products that I'd want to own myself.
Aperion's original design was valid for its purpose but I felt the sub could use more low F at the expense of some high F. Their engineer obviously agreed and they came out with a new model. It's strange to see some scalding the manufacturer instead of applauding their open-mindedness to want to make a product better. Some manufacturers can't handle criticism and threaten to drop advertising if our reviews have any negative feedback, I can assure you Aperion is NOT one of them. That speaks volumes for them not only in their faith in their products but in us.
To that end, Aperion should be commended!
smurphy522, post: 791339
Did Aperion actually re-designed this based on the review/suggestion from Audioholics? If so I give credit to Audioholics!
I can't say that I would even consider owning a product which designs and manufactures speaker (hey that's all they do) and make extreme design changes based on the comment from a reviewer, that's just plain getting PWND.
They design, test, manufacture and sell a product that just was not a good idea in the 1st place based on enclosure size? Come on give me a break.
While I agree to some extent with what you are saying, I think it is important to consider the matter of degree.
I have read several reviews of this subwoofer; both pro and consumer. None of them considered it a bad subwoofer. Generally, the impression was that it provided good performance for the compact form factor and good convenience via the RC at a reasonable pricepoint. The AH review gave it a performance rating of 4. So it is not the case that this was a bad sub design which should have never made it to market.
I believe that even in as few as the past 5 years, we have seen significant across the board improvements in subwoofer performance from most vendors. Subwoofer design is not yet a mature technology.
Another person might applaud Aperion for being proactively responsive to constructive criticisms. It looks like the AH review was written in 3/2010 and I believe the Bravus II series came out pretty soon thereafter.
It is all a matter of perspective.
PS: I don't have any affiliation with Aperion - I have never even heard one of their products. I am a tremendous fan-boy of their risk free audition policy!
smurphy522, post: 791339
Did Aperion actually re-designed this based on the review/suggestion from Audioholics? If so I give credit to Audioholics!
I can't say that I would even consider owning a product which designs and manufactures speaker (hey that's all they do) and make extreme design changes based on the comment from a reviewer, that's just plain getting PWND.
They design, test, manufacture and sell a product that just was not a good idea in the 1st place based on enclosure size? Come on give me a break.
so they respond well to constructive criticism and you criticize their capability? The old bravus was a high output and punchy sub. For a lot of music that is something many people really like.
they went with passive radiators instead of two active drivers, whoch gives it more low end as Gene pointed out is more desired, at least for home theater. it likely reduces the midbass output capability by a solid 4-6 db on the other hand. it might measure better and technically sound better but who knows if it appeals to the masses better?
both are valid design choices when the desired end result is more than just making the best no compromise sub. there is more to it than just knowing what works. it is about actually selling the product, and aperion is obviously trying to differentiate their sub so that it isnt just the same driver/port box as everyone else.
gene, post: 791118
Since my review of the 10D and my criticism that dual drivers in such a small enclosure limits its extension, Aperion has redesigned it so that one driver is active and one is passive.
See: https://www.aperionaudio.com/product/NEW-Bravus-II-10D-Powered-Subwoofer,274,66,812.aspx
I suspect the low end extension will be improved in the newer model and plan on testing it sometime down the road.
They actually went with two passive and one active drivers:
gave Bravus a completely new driver design that includes one down-firing active woofer and two side-firing passive radiators
Confused about what AV Gear to buy or how to set it up? Join our Exclusive Audioholics E-Book Membership Program!