“Let our rigorous testing and reviews be your guidelines to A/V equipment – not marketing slogans”
Facebook Youtube Twitter instagram pinterest

HDCP Master Key Cracked with $267 Custom Board

by December 07, 2011
HDCP Master Key Cracked

HDCP Master Key Cracked

Apparently HDCP has been cracked. Now, Blu-ray content protection has been cracked before. At least, it's been cracked such that you can rip and store the files to hard drive if, you know, you're a glutton for punishment and have enough hard disc space to make this practical. Our thought has been that picking up a Blu-ray Disc jukebox like Sony's BDP-CX7000ES ($750) or the Pioneer DV-F727 ($600) makes a lot more sense, even though it's not as nifty as having a smooth digital interface for all your movies. But "researchers" at the Secure Hardware Group of Ruhr University of Bochum (RUB) in Germany claim to have cracked Intel's HDCP using hardware.

And they did it for around $267 and parts you can obtain and use on your own.

So how does this differ from the cracked master key - accomplished back in 2010? Well, the cracked master key allows the generation of new keys that will work with players, etc - thus removing the issue of "revoked" keys from inhibiting the copying of Blu-ray and other protected content. The trouble is, the presence of this master key wasn't terribly significant since there would need to be hardware created in order for it to have any practical use in circumventing copy protection on any large scale.

This new crack, since it involves hardware, is the realization of that vulnerability. Now, with a $267 board, you can run HDMI into a box and get unprotected digital or analogue content at 1080p resolution out of it. Here's how they claimed to have done it:

Intel's HDCP encryption was cracked using a "man-in-the-middle" (MITM) attack with an inexpensive field programmable gate array (FPGA) board. The build used an ATLYS board from Digilent, a HDMI port equipped Xilinx Spartan-6 FPGA, and a serial RS232 port for communication. The board was able to manipulate and decode the communication between the Blu-ray player and the HDTV without being detected.

Whether or not that's terribly practical is another question entirely. Certainly it opens up the door for illegal boxes that could be used to serve BD-sourced media from hard drives, something that even media giant Kaleidescape has been unable to do legally without the ridiculous mandate of also actually storing the physical disc in their "Disc Vault" carousel system.

We'd have to say that the cracking of Intel's HDCP system in a hardware device is an interesting development, but one that we don't fully understand as of yet - at least not the ramifications. Will there be an influx of black market boxes? Will there be an influx of modular components that together might yield the ability to enable media servers for home use? The possibilities are limitless, but with storage capacities being so demanding for uncompressed BD media (and honestly, why not rip a DVD if you don't want BD quality?) there is also the question of practicality.

Basically: do you even WANT to rip Blu-ray discs to hard drive?

If you do, then you'll want to keep your eyes peeled for developments in this area. If you're like me, however, you've still got your eye on streaming solutions and the future of media delivery systems - which seems to be anything BUT Physical in its composition.

The whole point of the RUB research was, as they described, "to investigate the safety of the HDCP system at its most fundamental level". They also wanted to see what the actual costs for a hardware-based solution would be, once the solution was achieved. The conclusive results spell the end of the thought that HDCP remains as secure as it was once thought to be. Still, a decade isn't a bad run and we'd have to admit that Blu-ray has enjoyed a relatively secure life so far as a protected media delivery system.

What we'd like to know is: why don't you rip Blu-ray Discs? Or do you? Answer our poll in the forums and let us know.

Slee_Stack posts on December 11, 2011 22:50
I like the idea of an (economical) commercial box. Perhaps I could finally rip my SACD collection. All of my other music, including my DVD-A titles, resides on my media center and is so convenient to access. Still I have to go reaching for the SACDs when I want to hear them. Adding insult to injury is that most of my SACDs are irreplaceable if they ever fail. Most are out of print and the prospect of paying $150-$200 for a USED replacement one isn't exactly attractive. Currently I have one SACD which is de-laminating at the spindle hole. It still plays fine, but it really underscores why ‘Fair Use’ laws are, indeed, fair. Should my discs die, there will be no replacements from the manufacturer and that's just wrong. I want ‘em ripped!


As an aside, I do know you can rip SACD with certain older PS3s, but I don’t own one. They currently run $500+ too. Bleh.
BoredSysAdmin posts on December 08, 2011 23:13
GlocksRock, post: 846796
I remember the first time I saw the DTS-HD MSTR light up on my receiver, it was like Christmas all over again!


I make .iso files from folders and it doesn't take that long, but I guess it all depends on your pc, and I also use separate drives for source and target. But I will say, having upgraded my network to gigabit really made a huge difference in transferring those giant files around.

I cant really blame my pc - it's pretty new - core i5-2500k and 8gb ddr3
harddrives are older, but one newest one is wd green
perhaps not the best choice for a fast drive , but it got tons of room

Yes, Christmas -but in green
GlocksRock posts on December 08, 2011 21:47
BoredSysAdmin, post: 846749
No idea how topic about HTCP turned into BD ripping - one has almost nothing to do with the other, but I'll chime on the later

Only yesterday for the first time ever I saw DTS-HD MSTR label lid up on my receiver. That said few annoying issues came forward rather quickly.

Making ISO file out of folders with BD files is rather long and annoying process despite the fact I'm using separate drives for source and target
50MB/s write speeds - while ok for 4gb DVD images - manipulating BD's with 10 times the size is rather cumbersome and slow

Need to start planning for fast network storage system …

100Mbs home network is OK for streaming a BD image, but preloading of menus (I assume it called BD-Live) is quite annoyingly slow as it takes a minute or two - I gotta go to 1 Gb network

I remember the first time I saw the DTS-HD MSTR light up on my receiver, it was like Christmas all over again!


I make .iso files from folders and it doesn't take that long, but I guess it all depends on your pc, and I also use separate drives for source and target. But I will say, having upgraded my network to gigabit really made a huge difference in transferring those giant files around.
BoredSysAdmin posts on December 08, 2011 18:11
No idea how topic about HTCP turned into BD ripping - one has almost nothing to do with the other, but I'll chime on the later

Only yesterday for the first time ever I saw DTS-HD MSTR label lid up on my receiver. That said few annoying issues came forward rather quickly.

Making ISO file out of folders with BD files is rather long and annoying process despite the fact I'm using separate drives for source and target
50MB/s write speeds - while ok for 4gb DVD images - manipulating BD's with 10 times the size is rather cumbersome and slow

Need to start planning for fast network storage system …

100Mbs home network is OK for streaming a BD image, but preloading of menus (I assume it called BD-Live) is quite annoyingly slow as it takes a minute or two - I gotta go to 1 Gb network
FirstReflection posts on December 08, 2011 17:43
its phillip, post: 846611
Let's just say you have one 3TB drive full of bluray isos fail on you. That'll probably be 60-80 movies (a guess, since I've never ripped a bluray or downloaded a bluray iso). How long would it take you to rip those again? It would probably make more sense to just have some sort of redundancy - it won't be a true backup, but it'll be better than nothing.

Yup, I've got about 75-80 Blu-ray ISO files (plus the MyMovies covers and metadata for each movie) on each 3TB drive. Would some sort of redundancy save me from having to re-rip all of those discs? Yes, it surely would. And maybe one day I'll set things up that way. But not right this minute since hard drive prices have doubled

To be honest, re-ripping 80 discs doesn't take as long as one might think. That's mainly because I've got 4 computers (including my laptop) with a Blu-ray drive (or external USB Blu-ray drive) for each. So, it's about a 20 hour venture to re-rip 80 movies. Certainly, that sucks. But since the DS411j NAS servers are rather slow and not very powerful, it isn't exactly a speedy process to rebuild a RAID setup after a disc replacement either! Faster than re-ripping, absolutely. But, like I said, not the end of the world It'll give me an excuse to vacuum and dust the boxes in my closet where all the physical discs are in storage
Post Reply
About the author:
author portrait

Clint Deboer was terminated from Audioholics for misconduct on April 4th, 2014. He no longer represents Audioholics in any fashion.

View full profile