Skip to content. Skip to navigation
You are here: Home Pro Reviews Acoustical Products GiK Tri-Trap Bass Trap Review Tri-Trap Setup and Conclusion
#########
   Alabama
   Alaska
   Arizona
   Arkansas
   California
   Colorado
   Connecticut
   DC
   Delaware
   Florida
   Georgia
   Hawaii
   Idaho
   Illinois
   Indiana
   Iowa
   Kansas
   Kentucky
   Louisiana
   Maine
   Maryland
   Massachusetts
   Michigan
   Minnesota
   Mississippi
   Missouri
   Montana
   Nebraska
   Nevada
   New Hampshire
   New Jersey
   New Mexico
   New York
   North Carolina
   North Dakota
   Ohio
   Oklahoma
   Oregon
   Pennsylvania
   Rhode Island
   South Carolina
   South Dakota
   Tennesee
   Texas
   Utah
   Vermont
   Virginia
   Washington
   West Virginia
   Wisconsin
   Wyoming
 

Tri-Trap Setup and Conclusion

by Tom Andry last modified April 29, 2009

I placed the Tri-Traps in the two rear corners stacked two high and laid the two others on the floor behind the couch. At this point, you are pretty much done, right?

Mostly.

GiK_gap.JPGGiK doesn't really have any way of mounting the Tri-Traps in the corner. Why would you need to? Well, no matter what your builder says, your corners might not but perfectly square. If not, the Tri-Traps might stick out a bit. The only way to combat this is to pull them in as tight as possible. Also fighting against you is any trim around the bottom or top of your wall. Most walls have at least a few inches of baseboard. Without some sort of cutout on the bottom edge of the trap (something that might serious increase the construction cost of the trap), the baseboard will push the entire trap off the wall. If you are stacking them like I am, that means that the top trap can be over 2 inches off the wall! Some of the solutions I've seen online have been industrial Velcro (be careful, once it is on you'll probably have to destroy the trap to get it off), L-brackets, and picture hangers. I'd like to see GiK come up with a solution that can be integrated into the design. Since I'm stacking mine and had a few inches between the ceiling and the top of the top trap, I went with a more "removable" solution than the industrial Velcro. Basically, I pushed the traps back into the corner and wedged some small pieces of scrap wood between the ceiling and the top trap. This held both the traps in place and minimized the gap between the traps and the wall without being "permanent." If you have crown molding on your ceiling you're going to need to order a custom height solution to get it under the edge of the molding.

GiK_wall.JPGThe traps are very light - almost too light. While GiK has had their traps measured and I don't doubt their effectiveness, there does seem to be a lot of extra room in there. I spoke to Glenn Kuras (owner/founder) of GiK about the traps (specifically because I didn't want to take mine apart just to see the insides) and he stated that they went with 4 lbs insulation and not a heavier one because the performance differences in this application were nominal. While I have no problem with that, having a trap with a lot of room between the front fabric and the start of the insulation was a little disconcerting at first. I'd expected a solid mass of insulation with maybe treated corners or perhaps some wood/plastic bracing at the corners.

What I found particularly disconcerting was that the back two sides of the trap were solid. I'd much prefer a more "wire" frame around the insulation. According to GiK, this solid panel is by design:

The way we build them and the materials we use provide a membrane effect to boost the low frequency absorption while at the same time, roll off upper mid and high frequency absorption. This is done to be able to properly treat a room in the bottom end without overdamping the mids and highs. Most rooms already have plenty of upper mid/high frequency absorption with carpeting, curtains, etc.

A solid panel, especially as light as the material they used, is going to vibrate. This could add noise to the room. While they are claiming that this is acting like a diaphragmatic absorber, it really is a dangerous gambit. If that membrane vibrates at a frequency that you don't need dampened, it could be adding to your problems or perhaps creating new ones. The solutions could be to either to eliminate it and go with a more frame-less solution or to stuff the trap more solidly so that the insulation itself stops any possible vibrations.

Listening Evaluation

You only have to read the Auralex review to know what I thought of the Tri-Traps' performance. In my room, almost every metric was improved - at least subjectively. From an objective measurement standpoint, my improvements were not as dramatic but I chalk that up to the fact that I could only measure one speaker from one listening position. If you factor in the sub (which wasn't included in the Auralex measurement), I'm guessing you'll see a much more dramatic improvement (as my secondary measurements with the Velodyne SMS-1 showed).

I think the more dramatic subjective difference for me was the bass response and imaging. As I mentioned in the Auralex review, the bass problems were much reduced and I could tell dramatic differences between before and after listening sessions with material like Attack of the Clones. At the beginning of the movie there is a flyover of the ships as they are landing. The bass is dramatic, deep, and sweeping which is exactly what you want for a listening evaluation. In nearly every room I've been in (including mine) you can hear how the room (and speakers in some cases) affect the sound. Instead of a slow, steady sweep, it will get louder at times and cut out at other times. The Velodyne SMS-1 helped with this quite a bit but it was still there. When I added the Tri-Traps, while it didn't completely alleviate the problem, the differences were amazing. Much more linear, much tighter, the whole experience was better.

On a more questionable note, I felt that the imaging of the room increased. While a one eared man fighting an octopus could hear the differences in the bass response, the imaging was a bit subtler. Pans were more convincing, left/right separation more defined, and the overall listening experience was increased. The Tri-Traps seemed to be taking a lot of the "noise" out of the room. This is exactly what they are designed to do and I felt they really made a big difference.

While I would normally include aesthetics as part of the setup, since you're going to be "hearing" about them more from your spouse than actually "hearing" the bass traps, I'm including it here. Let's be frank, corner traps are never going to make your spouse as excited as they are going to make you. They don't get it and that's just a fact of most of our lives. But the Tri-Traps do everything they can to minimize the confrontation. They offer multiple fabric color combinations, they are designed (with a little DIY help) to sit flush to the wall, and they are relatively small. I think the most important thing is that the edges are pointed. Other corner solutions are circular which I think looks weird. Some of the others that I've seen are pointed but a fraction of the size of the Tri-Traps. I'm sorry but the whole point of a corner trap is to reduce bass frequencies. If you're going to go through the hassle and expense, you might as well do it right. Sticking a tiny bit of material in the corner just isn't going to do it (this is physics, people, no matter how many customer reviews the competition might have). No amount of engineering can replace the physics of needing material in there to combat the sound waves as they pass through. On top of that, I couldn't find a corner trap that was even close to the Tri-Traps for value. Most cost 2x's the price of the Tri-Traps. Some more. A deal is always a good argument on the spousal front.

Conclusion

GiK_stock.jpgI very rarely say anything unequivocal in a review. Hold on to your hats 'cause I'm gonna to do it now. The GiK Tri-Traps will improve the sound in your room. They will. It doesn't matter the speaker or the amp. The DVD player or the processor. The Tri-Traps will help curb your bass problems. Are they a panacea? Will the fix everything? No, of course not. But ask any acoustical expert and you'll find that corner bass trapping is high up on their list of "first steps to a better sounding room." GiK makes this easy and frankly affordable. With the rest of the competition costing much more (for products that are no better and many probably much worse), the GiK Tri-Traps are a no-brainer for the enthusiast that is serious about making their room sound better.

GiK Tri-Trap Bass Traps

$258 (for 2)

GIK Acoustics USA
3065 McCall Dr, Unit 8
Atlanta, GA 30340

1.888.986.2789

www.gikacoustics.com

About GIK Acoustics
GIK Acoustics is committed to making sure all of our products have certified testing. Would you buy a monitor without a data sheet? We think acoustics should be the same. All GIK products are tested at Riverbank Acoustical Laboratories and we are able to provide you with certified absorption reports for the GIK 244 Acoustic Panel and the GIK Monster Bass Trap.

The Score Card

The scoring below is based on each piece of equipment doing the duty it is designed for. The numbers are weighed heavily with respect to the individual cost of each unit, thus giving a rating roughly equal to:

Performance × Price Factor/Value = Rating

Audioholics.com note: The ratings indicated below are based on subjective listening and objective testing of the product in question. The rating scale is based on performance/value ratio. If you notice better performing products in future reviews that have lower numbers in certain areas, be aware that the value factor is most likely the culprit. Other Audioholics reviewers may rate products solely based on performance, and each reviewer has his/her own system for ratings.

Audioholics Rating Scale

  • StarStarStarStarStar — Excellent
  • StarStarStarStar — Very Good
  • StarStarStar — Good
  • StarStar — Fair
  • Star — Poor
MetricRating
PerformanceStarStarStarStarStar
Build QualityStarStarStar
Ergonomics & UsabilityStarStarStarStar
Fit and FinishStarStarStarStar
AppearanceStarStarStar
PerformanceStarStarStarStar
ValueStarStarStarStarStar
Buy Now
Post Reply
Vaughan Odendaa posts on May 05, 2009 06:42
Can anyone offer their views on the tri-traps ? Impressions ? Measurements...before and after ?

I think it's way too early for this thread to die. Let's try to keep it alive.

Regards,
Vaughan Odendaa posts on May 02, 2009 18:08
Nice review. I ordered 4 tri-traps and should be getting them next week hopefully. Can't wait to test them out.

Regards,
Weasel9992 posts on April 30, 2009 15:31
FirstReflection;559905
How do these compare to acoustic foam corner bass traps such as the Auralex LENRD bass traps? I found it a bit odd to praise the price of these GiK Tri-traps when the LENRD traps are the same size and about half the price?


Actually, just to remove the question of subjectivity from the discussion entirely, all you have to do is look at the lab results for both products. The numbers aren't even close.

Frank
bpape posts on April 30, 2009 15:23
First of all, thanks for taking the time to review our product. We feel it's an excellent performer at a reasonable price.

The purpose of bass control is to not only address frequency response anomalies, but also to bring the decay time in the room more into line. In many rooms, the time for bass to decay can be almost a factor of 8-10x the time for upper mid and high freuqencies. Not only does this cause muddy bass, but it can also mask dialog, cause issues with low level details, etc.

Having treatments in the corners has specific benefits:

- Cover the corner space to minimize 'horn effect'

- Corners are at the ends of multiple room dimensions so they tend to help with problems in 2 or even 3 dimensions

From our unofficial testing, the Tri Traps are effective down to around 50Hz. They'll still do something below that but not as efficiently as 50Hz up. 50Hz down, the waves are just SO large that they're difficult to deal with.

One other clarification from the review - while we do have a membrane in the Tri Traps, it is not the type of tuned membrane that was described. It's a damped membrane that functions over a wide area while serving double duty as a semi-reflector for upper mid and high frequencies to minimize the probability of overdamping that part of the spectrum.

For a true tuned membrane, the observations in the review would be correct and one would need to be sure that they're matching the design frequency to match the area you're trying to deal with. Ours are broadband devices. Tuning is accomplished by a combination of membrane mass, depth of cavity, and size of the membrane. For instance, a 2'x4' membrane would have a different tuned resonance than a 1'x8' membrane with the same cavity depth and membrane material.

Again, many thanks for the review. I'll try to keep watch on this thread and answer any questions anyone might have

Bryan
Jeff R. posts on April 30, 2009 14:44
So is the improvement in sound from absorption of the sound waves and vibrations or is is it in the reduction of the 90 degree angle at the wall that is redirecting the longer sound waves associated with bass frequencies. I am curious, because my new HT room has 2 135 degree angles on the front wall to ceiling transition the that start about 5 feet up the wall and transition toward the listening postion to tie to the ceiling.

With my front sound stage on this wall I perceive a larger and more balanced sound stage with increased bass output from my sub and front speakers, I am wondering if this some how relates to the design premise of having them to make a normal 90 degree angle into 2 x 135 degree angles.

Jeff
Post Reply
 
Join our Newsletter for News & Deals
#########