Skip to content. Skip to navigation
You are here: Home Tips & Tricks Speaker Setup Guidelines Placement Suggestion for Cubed Speakers
#########
   Alabama
   Alaska
   Arizona
   Arkansas
   California
   Colorado
   Connecticut
   DC
   Delaware
   Florida
   Georgia
   Hawaii
   Idaho
   Illinois
   Indiana
   Iowa
   Kansas
   Kentucky
   Louisiana
   Maine
   Maryland
   Massachusetts
   Michigan
   Minnesota
   Mississippi
   Missouri
   Montana
   Nebraska
   Nevada
   New Hampshire
   New Jersey
   New Mexico
   New York
   North Carolina
   North Dakota
   Ohio
   Oklahoma
   Oregon
   Pennsylvania
   Rhode Island
   South Carolina
   South Dakota
   Tennesee
   Texas
   Utah
   Vermont
   Virginia
   Washington
   West Virginia
   Wisconsin
   Wyoming
 

Placement Suggestion for Cubed Speakers

by Gene DellaSala last modified August 25, 2004

I can't tell you how many times I have been to department stores and walked by their electronics section to find salesmen luring customers into buying cubed speakers. I can recall a specific time when I heard a few customers stating " this is really amazing, I can't believe the sound these little things have. "

My experience is quite different whenever I have the unfortunate opportunity of listening. I always say to myself " this is really amazing, a company managed to produce a set of junky speakers made of cheap paper, low build quality and parts, for about 1/10 the retail cost. They change the series number every few years to advertise it as new and improved product, and through clever marketing, manage to convince the general public that they are the best thing since sliced bread ."

Since consumers continue to desire these speakers, because of their "amazing sound" and "small footprint", I have devised an optimal placement scheme (see Fig. 1 below) to help maximize performance and minimize space consumption.

cubed_speakers_th.gif
Figure 1. Optimal Placement for "Cubed" Speakers

Logic Behind Placement Scheme

Some may wonder why I am recommending the placement scheme as in Fig.1. Here is why:

  • The so called subwoofer, is a poorly designed bandpass enclosure with 5 1/4" paper woofers. It hardly has the excursion abilities to produce bass frequencies lower than 60Hz, yet the 3dB point is beyond 200Hz. The frequency response of this subwoofer is well within the voice band, while the "cubes" do not have the frequency extension to play the lower vocal frequencies. Therefore, in order to reproduce as much of the voiceband as possible without any major gaps, or nulls, I recommend placing the subwoofer on top of the TV with the center channel "cube". This will optimize center channel performance.
  • The "cube" speakers have such limited imaging and stereo separation that it really doesn't matter if you place them far apart or close by. Therefore, in order to maximize space efficiency, I recommend placing them on top of the TV at each end. This also saves the consumer considerable money on stands or wall brackets making the system a better value per dollar.
  • Since the rear "cubed" speakers suffer the same fate as the front ones, the same reasoning applies for their placement as in the 2nd bullet above. Why spend extra money on long speaker wire and stands when you can put these little jems at the bottom of the TV?
  • Placing optional "recoil springs" on the bottom of the TV will help inertially dampen the system to minimize resonance during bass transients.

I hope this placement guide helps those of you who are on the market to buy "cubed" speakers. If you have any further questions regarding these placement tips, feel free to contact your nearest "cubed" dealer or visit them online.

Discuss in Our Forums

PS. Yes, this article is a joke. Normally, we'd give you the benefit of the doubt as to intuitively inferring this, but some excitable fellows at AVSForum (you know who you are) prompted us to include this helpful note.

by Gene DellaSala last modified August 25, 2004
 
Join our Newsletter for News & Deals
#########