Skip to content. Skip to navigation
You are here: Home Tips & Tricks Do-It-Yourself (DIY) Topics Audiologic Schumakubins Loudspeaker Review
#########
   Alabama
   Alaska
   Arizona
   Arkansas
   California
   Colorado
   Connecticut
   DC
   Delaware
   Florida
   Georgia
   Hawaii
   Idaho
   Illinois
   Indiana
   Iowa
   Kansas
   Kentucky
   Louisiana
   Maine
   Maryland
   Massachusetts
   Michigan
   Minnesota
   Mississippi
   Missouri
   Montana
   Nebraska
   Nevada
   New Hampshire
   New Jersey
   New Mexico
   New York
   North Carolina
   North Dakota
   Ohio
   Oklahoma
   Oregon
   Pennsylvania
   Rhode Island
   South Carolina
   South Dakota
   Tennesee
   Texas
   Utah
   Vermont
   Virginia
   Washington
   West Virginia
   Wisconsin
   Wyoming
 

Audiologic Schumakubins Loudspeaker Review

by ken last modified May 07, 2008

Summary

  • Product Name: Audiologic Schumakubins Loudspeaker Review
  • Manufacturer: The Audiologic
  • Performance Rating: StarStarStarStar
  • Value Rating: StarStarStarStarhalf-star
  • Review Date: May 07, 2008 17:39
  • MSRP: $ 30 to $670
Specifications

  • 32Hz (vented) or 50Hz (sealed) - 20KHz
  • Anechoic sensitivity 84dB/2.83V
  • 6 Ohm load nominal
  • Crossover 1500Hz
  • Max 50Hz SPL, 103dB Excursion limited
  • Max 100Hz SPL, 112dB Power limited

Pros

  • Excellent imaging and sound stage
  • Narrow front baffle
  • Good value as a kit

Cons

  • Completed cabinets not really complete

Introduction

As a Do-it-yourself speaker builder I have found myself wondering many times as I perused the internet’s vast sea of home speaker builder’s selections as to what some of the DIY speaker kits would sound like. Hence I decided to check out the Schumakubins which were born on the Parts Express forum utilizing their very own Dayton drivers. The Schumakubins shined with their smooth midrange and tight bass. If you are interested in building speakers but a little reluctant the Schumakubins are a great opportunity. I recommend buying the kit with the precut front baffle. You will be on your way to getting the best sound for the least amount of money and work. Kit speakers are a great and fun way to get some really good sound enjoyment and the Schumakubins are a great way to start.

 

 

Recent Forum Posts:

Post Reply
Pete S posts on May 22, 2008 22:00
There is a common belief that iron cores are inferior to air core inductors. To an extent, that is true. But an iron core inductor used well below saturation will exhibit distortion levels orders of magnitude lower than the drivers they're connected to.

With the prices of copper these days, keeping the price of a passive crossover low almost mandates the use of iron/steel/ferrite as an inductance booster to lower the amount of copper required to achieve the desired result. The lower in frequency you go, the more it matters since the part values become quite large and expensive. Price out a 6mH air core inductor of 15ga or lower and you'll get a real shock.

The kit comes with many options, including one with no crossover, allowing the builder to simply use the accompanying schematic to construct the crossover with the parts they like the best. Low gauge air core inductors, boutique caps and metal film resistors may, or may not help in the overall production of sound, but it's a sure bet that the wallet will be a lot lighter.

The intention of the Schumakubins is bang for the buck, and a big sound in a small footprint at a low price. On that account, they really do shine. Crank them up and you'll really get a shock when you realize that those smallish 7" woofers are producing that full range sound.
Swerd posts on May 12, 2008 16:22
wadeh911;411033
Surprised to see iron core inductors still used, what was the crossover designer's explanation for this rather than air core?
The common belief is that air core inductors are better than any other kind for speaker crossovers is generally true, but not always. In 3-way speakers, or in this case a 2.5-way speaker, air core inductors are usually used everywhere in the crossover, except for the low-pass filter of the woofer, without significantly impacting the overall sound quality.

Iron core inductors use less copper wire, and as a result have much less resistance than equivalent air core inductors. For low-pass crossovers used with bass drivers, the lower resistance of an iron core inductor is worth it. The higher resistance of a large air core inductor would have a greater negative impact on the sound of a woofer that is probably already less sensitive than the other drivers in the speaker.
wadeh911 posts on May 10, 2008 12:19
Nice to see a loudspeaker review this thorough, particularly the recognition by the author for different listening tastes. Surprised to see iron core inductors still used, what was the crossover designer's explanation for this rather than air core? Also, what happened to the sand-filled wharfendale cabinet philosophies of yesteryear?
Post Reply
 
Join our Newsletter for News & Deals
#########