Westinghouse LVM-42w2 1080p LCD Display Review
Summary
- Product Name: LVM-42w2 1080p LCD Display
- Manufacturer: Westinghouse
- Performance Rating:



- Value Rating:




- Review Date: April 15, 2006
- MSRP: $2799
- Specifications
-
Viewable Screen Size: 42" Diagonal
Native/Optimum Resolution: 1920 x 1080 (16.7 Million colors)Compatible Modes
NTSC: 480i
HD Ready: 480p, 720p, 1080i, 1080p
PC: 1920 x 1080, 640 x 480, 800 x 600, 1024 x 768Contrast Ratio: 1000:1
Brightness: 550 cd/m2
Color Gamut: 75% NTSC
Lamp Life: 60,000 Hrs
Viewing Angle: 176° horizontal/vertical
Response Time: 8 msAudio
2-10 watt speakers, 10 watt SubwooferVideo Processing
Progressive Scan, Aspect Ratio Conversion, CCS (Cross Color Suppressor), 3D Noise Reduction, PIP, Inverse 3:2 pulldown, Freezing Picture, 3D Video Processing, 3D Comb FilterConnectors
HDMI-HDCP + L/R Audio (1) 480i/p, 720p, 1080i, 1080p
DVI -HDCP + L/R Audio (2) 480i/p, 720p, 1080i, 1080p
VGA/D-Sub/RGB + Audio mini jack (1) 480i/p, 720p, 1080i, 1080p
YPbPr Component Video + L/R Audio (2) 480i/p, 720p, 1080i, 1080p (not documented)
S-Video+ L/R Audio (1) 480i/p
Composite Video + L/R Audio (1) 480i/p
L/R Audio out (1) Switched, Fixed & Variable VolumePhysical Attributes
Dimensions (w/ base): 41.5" W x 28.0" H x 9" D; 57.3 lbs
Dimensions (w/o base): 41.5" W x 25.8" H x 4.5" D; 52 lbs
Cabinet Color: Silver/BlackInstallation Options
75mm x 75mm and 100mm x 100mm VESA 8 hole pattern wall mountsWarranty
1 year parts & labor
Pros
- 1080p native panel resolution and input – including component and DVI-D
- Slim, attractive display
- Possibly best bang for the buck in a 42" LCD
- Incredibly detailed
Cons
- Poor off-axis contrast
- True 1080p support limited to single DVI-D input
- No advanced user calibration options
- Random flaky performance issues
- No ATSC/NTSC tuner
- No advanced scaling modes for SD of HD content
Introduction
- LVM-42w2 Features & Build Quality
- LVM-42w2 Setup & Menu System
- LVM-42w2 Remote, Calibration & Benchmark Tests
- LVM-42w2 Viewing Evaluation
- LVM-42w2 Review Conclusion