46LX177 Calibration and Benchmark Testing
We
used Datacolor’s
Colorfacts Professional 6.0
software to measure the 46LX177's performance in various modes and
Color temperature settings. Unfortunately, there are no User
calibration controls for RGB Cut and Gain (you can adjust Blue and
Green Drive only) so we didn't include a post-calibration set of
measurements in our review (as is our policy, which encourages
manufacturers to make these controls available outside of a service
menu). Surprisingly, the Toshiba showed a dramatic deficiency in
Green. How it can do this and boast xvYCC support was beyond us,
however the tristimulus sensor has been fairly accurate to date. We
also noted a very odd gamma value of around 1.55 which is unusual and
way off our target of between 2.2 and 2.5. Blacks took off quickly
and whites got bright far too early in the grayscale as a result.
Tweak the Static Gamma setting down (like all the way) to produce a
more appealing curve. There was no perceived banding.
We took some ANSI contrast measurements and got the following, disappointing results:
-
192:1 – Movie Mode (backlight standard)
-
344:1 – Standard Mode
-
467:1 – Sports Mode
-
177:1 – Movie Mode (backlight all the way down)
In terms of real-world performance I like to see at least 400:1 on displays while in Theater picture modes. The results of our tests here backed up our viewing tests which showed that the Toshiba simply didn't have the ability to achieve very dark black levels.
Color temperature was pretty good. Here are what the various modes yield in their default settings:
-
14300K – Sports Mode
-
8700K – Standard Mode
-
6750K – Movie Mode (Color Temp Warm)
-
8800K – Document Mode
With these results, you'll see below how well the Movie Mode with a Warm Color Temperature setting fared (pretty well as far as grayscale was concerned.)

Left:
After taking a few measurements in the Movie Mode with color
temperature set to Warm we received these results. Not too shabby
from 30 to 100IRE. Right: While the curve looks smooth, the overall
gamma curve comes in close to a straight diagonal line, meaning that
the gradual slope from black to white was a bit too harsh for our
tastes. Adjusting the Static Gamma setting to -4 helped this a bit.

Color
temperature as pretty good from 30 to 100IRE.
The measurements of the Toshiba 46LX177 were not up to what we had been expecting, especially with all the talk of xvYCC support. We next employed the 120Hz ClearFrame processing to see how it held up in real-world testing. On movies it indeed seemed to help remove some motion blur, but this was only perceptible a very minimal manner at lower speeds. Throwing up a Rainbow & Dither test from AVIA Pro, for example, we witnessed increased meaningful clarity at speeds of up to '5'. Beyond that the system simply resulted in slightly decreasing the thickness of blurred and trailing edges as they screamed across the display. Beyond '8' and the difference was unnoticeable.
When we ran some fine detail tests on it, however, the ClearFrame mode rendered artifacts in our Moving Zone Plate test pattern:

These
artifacts could be toggled on and off in real-time with the
ClearFrame setting.
While I never witnesses these artifacts in any movie viewing, the real strength of the technology seemed to be in its adaptation of 24p source material which it rendered with very little apparent judder effects.
Audioholics/HQV Bench Testing Summary of Test Results
Perfect
Score is 130
Toshiba
REGZA 46LX177 Benchmark Score: 53
(one of the worst performers we've seen this year)
| Test | Max Points |
Score | Pass/Fail |
| Color Bar | 10 | 10 | Pass |
| Jaggies #1 | 5 | 3 | Pass |
| Jaggies #2 | 5 | 0 | Fail |
| Flag | 10 | 5 | Pass |
| Detail | 10 | 10 | Pass |
| Noise | 10 | 5 | Pass |
| Motion adaptive Noise Reduction | 10 | 0 | Fail |
| Film Detail | 10 | 0 | Fail |
| Cadence 2:2 Video | 5 | 0 | Fail |
| Cadence 2:2:2:4 DV Cam | 5 | 0 | Fail |
| Cadence 2:3:3:2 DV Cam | 5 | 0 | Fail |
| Cadence 3:2:3:2:2 Vari-speed | 5 | 0 | Fail |
| Cadence 5:5 Animation | 5 | 0 | Fail |
| Cadence 6:4 Animation | 5 | 0 | Fail |
| Cadence 8:7 animation | 5 | 0 | Fail |
| Cadence 3:2 24fps film | 5 | 0 | Fail |
| Scrolling Horizontal | 10 | 10 | Pass |
| Scrolling Rolling | 10 | 10 | Pass |
| Total Points | 130 | 53 |
*We tested via HDMI at 480i resolution and confirmed via component video inputs at 480i
Comments on HQV Testing
Ouch. The Film Detail tests and 2:3 cadence tests almost never fail, however the lock-on time was extremely slow and for some reason the Toshiba never cleanly locked on to an unflagged 2:3 cadence. Feed this display a good, solid progressive scan source as the onboard video processing left us wanting for more. Let me reiterate: if you have a nice DVD or HD DVD player and a cable box that can output 1080i then you won't have a problem with this display. If you plan on feeding it a 480i source you may want to take another look at your options.
See also:
Recent Forum Posts:
MDS;356840
So now to add insult to injury Toshiba is releasing a whole slew of new models starting February. I've already proven I can go 6 months without TV so maybe I'll wait a little longer to see what these new models can do.
Anyone wanna bet that I'll get my whole house tiled before I pick another TV?
From what I've seen at AVSforum, I'd be surprised if their new models were any different. Both the HL167 series and LX177 series had this issue of not being adequately set from the factory. They didn't want to address it before and I'm loathe to believe they will address it now. I guess we can wait till the new model line is reviewed to see how much work they have to do to get an accurate picture setting. Why they can't just put the setting necessary to calibrate the set accurately in the user's control is beyond me. Hell, add a new button on the remote....all reset. Brings all setting back to the factory defaults. Make it one of those buttons that you have to press with a safety pin so it's not easily activated and there you go.
mtrycrafts;356721
Because the 'general public' has no idea and don't care if they were impressed with what they saw in the store thinking falsely that is how it is supposed to be.
And, it is the 'general public' that buys most of the sets, not us.
I want to be part of the general public.
I am sick to death of this process of choosing a TV. As I've said the Toshiba was mostly pretty good to my eyes with the exception of the few cases where there was excess green when I thought there shouldn't be (I don't think it qualified as 'green push' where you saw green in the blacks - I never saw that). It was mostly the SD quality that annoyed me and with my limited experience with actually owning an HDTV for all I know that is all you can expect.
So now to add insult to injury Toshiba is releasing a whole slew of new models starting February. I've already proven I can go 6 months without TV so maybe I'll wait a little longer to see what these new models can do.
Anyone wanna bet that I'll get my whole house tiled before I pick another TV?
MDS;355954
... no TV in the history of mankind has been shipped with an accurate gray scale (to the D6500K standard).
Because the 'general public' has no idea and don't care if they were impressed with what they saw in the store thinking falsely that is how it is supposed to be.
And, it is the 'general public' that buys most of the sets, not us.
avaserfi;356687
Most source material isn't necessarily 60Hz for example most film is done in 24Hz.
LCDs suffer from image blur where a fast moving image stays on the screen slightly (but visibly) longer than intended. Sometimes known as trailing this problem is due to the nature of LCD technology - having a faster refresh rate helps this problem by in a sense erasing the screen more often.
Another plus of properly done 120Hz refresh is that if your player does 24Hz output rather than having to deal with 3:2 pulldown to make the 24 frames match up to 60 you can just show the same frame 5 times and have less video issues.
Where you don't have 24Hz output though, doesn't the faster refresh rate just reapply the same image more frequently?
Thunder18;356448
... I have to say I was a lot more easily satisfied before HD. I couldn't see any difference and honestly I didn't really care at that resolution. Now that I can see the grease in the pores on the actors faces I can clearly see something is wrong and it bothers me to no end.
See what happens to us when we know a bit more
