Viewing Evaluations Continued and Conclusion
V for Vendetta
In the comic book world, a few writers stand out. Frank Miller, Neil
Gaiman, and of course Alan Moore.
The Watchmen,
probably one of the seminal miniseries in all of
comic-book-dom, was the brainchild of Moore.
V for Vendetta
was really my introduction to Moore
and stands as one of my favorite miniseries. The fact that they publicized this movie as
"from the
creators of the Matrix"
really did a disservice, in my opinion. Knowing the comic, I knew that it
wasn't very action-oriented but I think that people may have gone into the movie thinking that it
was going to be another action-fest. What they got was probably one of the most thought provoking movies
(featuring a masked hero) ever. The fact that V is called throughout the movie by friends and foe alike a
terrorist, really creates in the viewer a type of conflict. We want to like V because he is fighting the
good fight but the title
terrorist
is associated with so many negative acts in recent history
that you can't help but question your desire to empathize with him. Moore has categorically refused
to lend his name to any more of the movie adaptations of his works citing that it is too painful "[t]o see a line of dialogue or a character that I have poured that much emotional involvement
into, to see them casually travestied and watered down and distorted."
The Panasonic's rendition of this particular movie I felt to be somewhat lackluster. While colors and detail was once again impeccable, the amount of noise in the picture was a little distracting. I don't remember having these problems with the TH-50PH8UK. It was especially evident at the beginning of the movie where V saves Evey from the Fingermen. The scene is set on a dark, foggy night and the whole background looked a bit pixilated.
The Matador
In an almost unprecedented move, my wife decided to watch yet another movie with me (2 in a month, much less a week, is cause for celebration). I happened to have The Matador in from Netflix. I didn't know much about this movie only that I heard or read somewhere that it was pretty good. I'm not sure what kind of movie this is supposed to be (comedy, drama, action) but I liked it. Usually, three movies in a review like this would be enough but I had to include The Matador because of the colors. God, I sound like a drug addict, "Man, everything was so greeeeeeeeeeeen!" The backgrounds in the movie were some of the most colorful that I've ever seen. The hotel that Peirce Brosnan and Greg Kineer stay at in Mexico stands out. Lots and lots of yellows. Blues and greens in the bar. A pink wall that absolutely glowed. The TH-50PH9UK's ability to display vibrant colors cannot be adequately described in words or pictures. Every five minutes or so I'd hear my self saying, "Man, would you look at that wall?!"
Burn-in
Once again I had little problems with this panel with burn in. I didn't put it through the 6 hour World Cup torture test that I did the TH-50PHD8UK but I did a fair amount of viewing which included bars at the top or sides of the screen. The newer display seemed just as resistant to burn in as its older brother. One thing that I did notice is when the unit was set to Dynamic (which maxes out its brightness), I saw a bit of residual image from any white test. Specifically, from the menu of the Escient Fireball DVDM-300 . Once I dialed the unit back to Standard, which only moves the Picture setting down from 30 to 25, these effects all but disappeared. I don't recommend pushing this or any plasma to its limits (and if you do, let the screensaver run for a while to clear out any residual image) but in casual viewing, you should be OK.
Conclusions and Overall Perceptions
Once again, Panasonic has scored with the TH-50PH9UK. Sporting a fantastic picture with colors to be seen to believed, this plasma would make a worthy addition to any home theater. As long as it is paired with a high quality source such as an upconverting DVD player, you'll have to beat your friends off with a stick come movie night. One of the real joys of this unit is the absolute sleekness of it. No speakers, no unnecessary molding, it is just a piece of glass framed in dark grey. Everything you want in a monitor and nothing you don't.
The Score Card
The scoring below is based on each piece of equipment doing the duty it is designed for. The numbers are weighed heavily with respect to the individual cost of each unit, thus giving a rating roughly equal to:
Performance × Price Factor/Value = Rating
Audioholics.com note: The ratings indicated below are based on subjective listening and objective testing of the product in question. The rating scale is based on performance/value ratio. If you notice better performing products in future reviews that have lower numbers in certain areas, be aware that the value factor is most likely the culprit. Other Audioholics reviewers may rate products solely based on performance, and each reviewer has his/her own system for ratings.
Audioholics Rating Scale




— Excellent



— Very Good


— Good

— Fair
— Poor
| Metric | Rating |
|---|---|
| Detail and Resolution | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Deinterlacing & Scaling | ![]() ![]() |
| Contrast and Black Levels | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Color Reproduction | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Noise Reduction | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Calibration Options | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Build Quality | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Ergonomics & Usability | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Ease of Setup | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Features | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Remote Control | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Performance | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Value | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
