Skip to content. Skip to navigation
You are here: Home Pro Reviews Speakers Subwoofers HSU Research VTF-3 MK3 Subwoofer Review VTF-3 MK3 Conclusion
#########
   Alabama
   Alaska
   Arizona
   Arkansas
   California
   Colorado
   Connecticut
   DC
   Delaware
   Florida
   Georgia
   Hawaii
   Idaho
   Illinois
   Indiana
   Iowa
   Kansas
   Kentucky
   Louisiana
   Maine
   Maryland
   Massachusetts
   Michigan
   Minnesota
   Mississippi
   Missouri
   Montana
   Nebraska
   Nevada
   New Hampshire
   New Jersey
   New Mexico
   New York
   North Carolina
   North Dakota
   Ohio
   Oklahoma
   Oregon
   Pennsylvania
   Rhode Island
   South Carolina
   South Dakota
   Tennesee
   Texas
   Utah
   Vermont
   Virginia
   Washington
   West Virginia
   Wisconsin
   Wyoming
 

VTF-3 MK3 Conclusion

by mark last modified October 22, 2007

Graphic 6 Big.jpgOver the years I’ve been exposed to many, many subs, in both home and professional settings. Along the way I’ve encountered some truly superb products. It’s really is easy to become spoiled once you’ve had the opportunity to experience the very best that’s out there. So when Gene approached with the idea to review a modestly-priced subwoofer, I was quite prepared not to like it. Quite the opposite happened in that not only did I like what this sub could do, but was consistently surprised by how well Dr Hsu managed to get this thoroughbred with a 12” driver to perform – and perform on a consistent basis. I’ll close with a strong buy recommendation; buy two if the budget allows for it!



HSU Research
VTF-3 Mk3
MSRP: $699.00/unit; without turbo option
http://www.hsuresearch.com

The Score Card

The scoring below is based on each piece of equipment doing the duty it is designed for. The numbers are weighed heavily with respect to the individual cost of each unit, thus giving a rating roughly equal to:

Performance × Price Factor/Value = Rating

Audioholics.com note: The ratings indicated below are based on subjective listening and objective testing of the product in question. The rating scale is based on performance/value ratio. If you notice better performing products in future reviews that have lower numbers in certain areas, be aware that the value factor is most likely the culprit. Other Audioholics reviewers may rate products solely based on performance, and each reviewer has his/her own system for ratings.

Audioholics Rating Scale

  • StarStarStarStarStar — Excellent
  • StarStarStarStar — Very Good
  • StarStarStar — Good
  • StarStar — Fair
  • Star — Poor
MetricRating
Bass ExtensionStarStarStarStarStar
Bass AccuracyStarStarStarStarStar
Build QualityStarStarStarStar
AppearanceStarStarStar
Dynamic RangeStarStarStarStar
PerformanceStarStarStarStarhalf-star
ValueStarStarStarStarStar
Buy Now
Post Reply
bigbangtheory posts on October 30, 2007 16:48
I've been doing a lot of research and talking to manufacturers lately about subs. My conclusion has been that HSU and SVS Sound probably offer the best bang for the buck performance of ANY sub company. I also know from word of mouth and some anecdotal evidence too that these companies are in it for the long haul and know how to take care of their customers.
paulf7509 posts on October 29, 2007 10:35
thanks for that review - it was very helpful as I am currently searching for subwoofers for my home theater system
annunaki posts on October 25, 2007 12:15
The bent ports in this patent-pending design were engineered specifically to reduce turbulence associated with the port bend.

Mark did not review the turbocharger. He mentioned port noise tendencies only in the extended bass mode with port plug, which is exactly the situation we were trying to move away from with turbocharger. Port noise is definitely not an issue with the turbocharger.

Sure one could design a larger enclosure, but even that would see a performance benefit from using turbocharger instead of plugging a port to reduce port tuning. The idea was definitely to make the unit install in a modular fashion.

That makes sense.
Peter Marcks posts on October 25, 2007 02:55
The bent ports in this patent-pending design were engineered specifically to reduce turbulence associated with the port bend.

Mark did not review the turbocharger. He mentioned port noise tendencies only in the extended bass mode with port plug, which is exactly the situation we were trying to move away from with turbocharger. Port noise is definitely not an issue with the turbocharger.

Sure one could design a larger enclosure, but even that would see a performance benefit from using turbocharger instead of plugging a port to reduce port tuning. The idea was definitely to make the unit install in a modular fashion.
annunaki posts on October 24, 2007 16:32
The turbo is a good idea but I don't like the idea of so many bends in the ports. There is one bend inside the enclosure and then two? outside if using the turbo. The bends just increase the likely hood for port noise. This seemed to show up in the review.

It is a great product and innovative design, no doubt though. Why not make a new sub that is a bit bigger (enclosure to house everything) with longer, straighter ports? Problem solved. I can see it as a great add on to existing sub systems though.
Post Reply
 
Join our Newsletter for News & Deals
#########