Skip to content. Skip to navigation
You are here: Home Pro Reviews Speakers Subwoofers JL Audio Fathom f112 Subwoofer Review Fathom f112 Measurements
#########
   Alabama
   Alaska
   Arizona
   Arkansas
   California
   Colorado
   Connecticut
   DC
   Delaware
   Florida
   Georgia
   Hawaii
   Idaho
   Illinois
   Indiana
   Iowa
   Kansas
   Kentucky
   Louisiana
   Maine
   Maryland
   Massachusetts
   Michigan
   Minnesota
   Mississippi
   Missouri
   Montana
   Nebraska
   Nevada
   New Hampshire
   New Jersey
   New Mexico
   New York
   North Carolina
   North Dakota
   Ohio
   Oklahoma
   Oregon
   Pennsylvania
   Rhode Island
   South Carolina
   South Dakota
   Tennesee
   Texas
   Utah
   Vermont
   Virginia
   Washington
   West Virginia
   Wisconsin
   Wyoming
 

Fathom f112 Measurements

by david last modified March 24, 2007

Measurements were performed using the Sample Champion program developed by Paolo Guidorzi of Purebits. The program is a Maximum Length Sequence (MLS) program that can generate an impulse response from this pseudorandom signal. The Fast Fourier Transformation is applied to the impulse response to generate the system frequency response. The operating principle is the same as that of the well known MLSSA program.

Test samples were taken using 16 bit resolution with a 48 kHz sampling frequency. Fast Fourier Transformations were performed at 64K allowing for a frequency resolution of .73 Hz, which is more refined than even 1/24th octave resolution at the lowest octave; the A0 key on the piano has a fundamental frequency of 27.5 Hz.

IR 90dB_1m.jpg

Figure 1: Impulse response.

Figure 1 is the subwoofer’s impulse response. The basic shape of the curve is typical of low frequency driver; here we see a fairly smooth curve that decays within a few cycles indicating good damping characteristics.

FR 80dB_1m.jpg

Figure 2: Frequency response.

Figure 2 shows the nearfield frequency response for a sound pressure level of 80 dB when measured at 1 meter. Significant roll off starts to occur around 21 to 22 Hz based on this measurement, which is within reasonable measurement tolerance of the published specifications.

FR 90-109dB_1m.jpg

Figure 3: Power compression curves.

Figure 3 shows frequency response at various SPL levels at 1 meter. Measurements were taken nearfield with peak sound pressures of 90, 100, 105, and 109 dB when measured at 1 meter from the sub. Analysis of these curves must include some understanding of measurement and instrumentation limitations. Due to environmental conditions prevailing in a Chicago winter, ground plane measurements were precluded as a possibility and due to the high output capabilities of this sub, nearfield measurement of max SPL caused clipping of the microphone preamp as volume is increased.

Tests I performed indicate that the sub can get between 105 and 109 dB at 1 meter before compression using a wide band frequency input such as an MLS signal. Consideration of measurement accuracy at high SPL must be tempered with understanding that MLS testing is sensitive to any nonlinearity in the measurement, including from test gear. The microphone preamp indicated clipping at 109 dB under the maximum gain adjustment I could make, so it is very likely that the f112 can actually get higher than indicated by these measurements.

JL SPL Plot.jpg

Figure 4: Maximum in room SPL at 2 meters by frequency.

Figure 4 was provided by JL Audio with a reported maximum rms SPL output of over 117 dB for a single frequency, a 62 Hz sine wave, and 112 dB averaged over a range between 25 and 62 Hz with THD between 5.2 to 9.9% for various frequencies, in room at 2 meters.

For real world input signals, such as music, the frequency content will be somewhere between these two limits and correspondingly, the SPL output will also be between these two bounds. Either way, SPL that exceeds 109 dB is a substantial amount of output.

 
Join our Newsletter for News & Deals
#########