Skip to content. Skip to navigation
You are here: Home Pro Reviews Speakers Bookshelf RBH Sound TK-5C Bookshelf Speaker System Review TK-5C Listening Tests
#########
   Alabama
   Alaska
   Arizona
   Arkansas
   California
   Colorado
   Connecticut
   DC
   Delaware
   Florida
   Georgia
   Hawaii
   Idaho
   Illinois
   Indiana
   Iowa
   Kansas
   Kentucky
   Louisiana
   Maine
   Maryland
   Massachusetts
   Michigan
   Minnesota
   Mississippi
   Missouri
   Montana
   Nebraska
   Nevada
   New Hampshire
   New Jersey
   New Mexico
   New York
   North Carolina
   North Dakota
   Ohio
   Oklahoma
   Oregon
   Pennsylvania
   Rhode Island
   South Carolina
   South Dakota
   Tennesee
   Texas
   Utah
   Vermont
   Virginia
   Washington
   West Virginia
   Wisconsin
   Wyoming
 

TK-5C Listening Tests

by Gene DellaSala last modified December 06, 2007

CD: Fourplay – The Best of Fourplayfourplay.jpg

What do you get when you combine some of Jazz’s most talented musicians in one band? Bubble gum “radio friendly” jazz for the most part unfortunately. There are moments of excellent musicianship on this CD; a few more meaty non radio friendly songs that seep through the pores of any jazz lover like spicy Mexican food does through a person suffering from IBS. Track #5 “Chant” separates the men from the mice when it comes to determining a loudspeaker's true dynamic capabilities. The kick drum at the opening passage will either radiate beautifully through a loudspeaker's bass drivers, or send their voice coils slapping out of the magnetic gap with a non-orgasmic popping sound. Trust me, it isn’t pleasant, nor is this punishment beneficial to the driver over prolonged exposure. Needless to say, the TK-5Cs handled this passage with much more grace and finesse than the Usher S-520s. The bass was tighter and cleaner on the TK-5Cs while it was more extended on the S-520s. As I cranked the volume up, the TK-5CTs began showing signs of distress, though never bottoming out, while the Ushers were bottoming hard sounding like one of those newspaper poppers I used to construct as a child to torment my bigger brother while he was napping. Basically the RBH’s traded off extension for greater power handling and dynamics. This, in my opinion, is a good trade off when dealing with small speakers as one could always add a subwoofer or two to achieve greater bass extension and impact. This of course is a requirement of home theater and I believe a necessity for all small single woofer speaker systems should you desire to reproduce the full frequency spectrum of your music.

CD: Donald Fagen – Morph the Catfagen.jpg

Morph the Cat is quickly becoming a regular in my test disc arsenal because of its excellent recording quality and the fact that some of the songs have really started to grow on me overtime. Track #8 “Mary Shut the Garden Door” has a lot going on percussion wise that really reveals a speaker's mettle. The TK-5Cs handled this track nicely placing the vocals upfront and center with good depth and detail in the percussions. I did however feel that the S-520s presented a wider soundstage, though somewhat more recessed in the vocals. The Ushers conveyed more smoothness in the top end at times but both speakers provided an equally enjoyable experience, though from a somewhat different perspective. Some of the tracks with embedded female vocals again proved the RBH’s more forward nature. Though they did well with vocals overall, at times they conveyed an almost “cupped” sound, which I suspect was due to a bit of cabinet resonance. This was a phenomenon not as apparently obvious when listening on the Ushers.

SACD: Patricia Barber – barber.jpgModern Cool

I had to dust the cobwebs off this SACD as it’s been some time since I incorporated it into a review. Track #7 “Company” got my juices flowing. This is one of those songs that you simply have to hear in its entirety, especially the awesome drum solo midway into it. The guitars were very distinct sounding and in your face on the RBH’s while the vocals were a bit more natural and the top end more refined on the Ushers. The RBH’s were clearly outgunning the Ushers in dynamics and dare I say “quickness” in the bass. I was able to pick up more reverb cues from the snare drum hits on the RBH’s. Track #6 “Silent Partner” really gave the tweeters in both speaker pairs a work out. While both systems did commendably well here, I felt the Usher’s took on a more floaty feel with the brush strokes against the cymbals and Patricia’s voice sounding a bit more natural, but the guitars were bolder (in your face) sounding on the RBHs which was very enjoyable.

As I listened to some of the other key tracks it occurred to me that on close mic’ed recordings such as these, the TK-5Cs almost overemphasize the vocals. Though I suspect the thinness in the lower bass was adding to this effect so I tried throwing a subwoofer into the mix and this did seem to smooth out the overall sonic balance.

 

Recent Forum Posts:

Post Reply
Clint DeBoer posts on February 02, 2008 18:27
silversurfer;368922
Depending on source material? It either colorizes the signal or it doesn't.
No, he means you can't always hear the coloration.
zhimbo posts on February 02, 2008 09:03
Josuah;368602
I have a hard time reconciling a 4.5 performance rating with the individual scores which never exceed 4....


Something with no weaknesses is darn good to have.

The overall scores aren't mathematically derived, they're subjective, but even if mathematically derived it wouldn't have to work by simple averaging. If you did something like percentile rank within a price range for all the sub-scores, then converted to a star score, 4.5 is probably about dead on (90th percentile).
silversurfer posts on February 01, 2008 22:24
This comment in the "cons" puzzles me:

A bit of lower midrange coloration present depending on source material

Depending on source material? It either colorizes the signal or it doesn't.
Josuah posts on February 01, 2008 12:17
I have a hard time reconciling a 4.5 performance rating with the individual scores which never exceed 4....
gene posts on December 06, 2007 21:12
Was that a typo in the review or just a mistake in pricing? I'm curious to know if that would effect the ratings considering that the costs were off by 25% ....


It was an error on RBH's part as I was originally told they were $400/pair. I was on the fence about giving them a 4.25 for value but since we only rate in 1/2 point scales now, I rounded down to 4 stars. The price adder would drop them to 3.75 but in that case I round up to 4 so it stays around the same.

While I believe you can find speakers at $500/pair that blow these away in aesthetics, I am still confident they perform up to par with some of the best speakers in their price class.
Post Reply
 
Join our Newsletter for News & Deals
#########