Skip to content. Skip to navigation
You are here: Home Pro Reviews A/V Receivers Sony STR-DA7100ES Receiver Review STR-DA7100ES Setup, Upconversion & Benchmark Tests
 

STR-DA7100ES Setup, Upconversion & Benchmark Tests

by Clint DeBoer last modified February 17, 2007 16:30

The best way to describe how video conversion and the "Progressive Out" settings work is to use a series of charts (kudos to Sony for including a version of these in their user manual):

VIDEO CONVERT: ON PROGRESSIVE OUT: ON

Input Signal

Monitor Out

Composite

S-Video

Component Video

Composite/s-video

Processing

Processing

Processing (480p)

Component video (480i)

Processing

Processing

Processing (480p)

Component video (480p)

NA

NA

NA

VIDEO CONVERT: ON PROGRESSIVE OUT: OFF

Input Signal

Monitor Out

Composite

S-Video

Component Video

Composite/s-video

Processing

Processing

Processing (480i)

Component video (480i)

Processing

Processing

Pass-through

Component video (480p)

NA

NA

Pass-through

VIDEO CONVERT: OFF PROGRESSIVE OUT: OFF

Input Signal

Monitor Out

Composite

S-Video

Component Video

Composite

Pass-through

NA

NA

S-video

NA

Pass-through

NA

Component video (480i)

NA

NA

Pass-through

Component video (480p)

NA

NA

Pass-through

In addition to providing 480p upconversion to all inputs except HDMI, the STR-DA7100ES can also provide basic picture adjustments including Brightness (black level), Color (saturation), and Hue (tint) controls. We really don't recommend using these controls as your display will more than likely offer them in finer adjustment increments.

Video Upconversion & Processing Performance

There are a few objective ways to gauge video processor performance in an AV receiver. One is to compare direct output from a source component to a display with the same output upconverted by the receiver. A second method would be to utilize a third party tool like Silicon Optix' HQV Benchmark DVD and evaluate a 480i input signal which has been upconverted to 480p by the receiver. We did both methods of evaluation using a Denon DVD-5900 which has dual composite and s-video outputs. One set went directly to a Pioneer PDP-42A3HD plasma display, the other set went to the Sony STR-DA7100ES receiver to be upconverted and processed out of the HDMI outputs. Have a look at our findings:

We started with comparisons of composite video to get a worst-case-input, best-possible-output scenario. I desaturated the pictures so it is easier to focus solely on resolution...

clip_image002_229.jpg clip_image004_107.jpg

Here we see composite video sent directly to the reference Pioneer plasma (left) vs. the Sony STR-DA7100ES'HDMI 480p upconverted and processed output.

While at first glance it appears the Sony has "cleaned up" the picture, what you are seeing is a subtle loss of resolution as the overall image is softened by the upconversion and deinterlacing process. I can't say that it was noticeable on real world moving video, but high resolution test patterns show the net result to be not unlike a gentle half-pixel Gaussian smoothing of the overall picture. On noisy images this may actually serve to improve picture quality.

STR-DA7100ES s-video direct STR-DA7100ES s-video converted

Again we see s-video signal sent directly to the reference Pioneer plasma (left) vs. the Sony STR-DA7100ES' HDMI 480p upconverted and processed output.

Similar to the composite input, the s-video input is also softened a bit. The original picture detail and scaling artifacts induced by the Pioneer are almost perfectly preserved - just rendered softer than the direct signal

I had consistent problems getting component 480i (non-progressive video) out of the Denon DVD-5900 (our reference DVD player for this review) to show up via the Sony's HDMI outputs. In fact none of the DVD players I had on hand could have their component video outputs (properly configured to output video at 480i) get upconverted by the Sony receiver. This was regardless of the "Progressive Out" setting. There seemed to be an issue with getting the 480i outputs recognized by the video processing circuitry. Switching to any of the other (non-component) inputs resulted in a successful upconversion experience.

Audioholics/HQV Bench Testing Summary of Test Results

Perfect Score is 130
Sony STR-DA7100ES Benchmark Score: 53 (room for improvement, but hey, this is a receiver!)

Test

Max
Points

Component
Results

Component
PassFail

Color Bar

10

5

Pass

Jaggies #1

5

3

Pass

Jaggies #2

5

0

Fail

Flag

10

5

Pass

Detail

10

10

Pass

Noise

10

0

Fail

Motion adaptive Noise Reduction

10

0

Fail

Film Detail

10

10

Pass

Cadence 2:2 Video

5

5

Pass

Cadence 2:2:2:4 DV Cam

5

0

Fail

Cadence 2:3:3:2 DV Cam

5

0

Fail

Cadence 3:2:3:2:2 Vari-speed

5

0

Fail

Cadence 5:5 Animation

5

0

Fail

Cadence 6:4 Animation

5

0

Fail

Cadence 8:7 animation

5

0

Fail

Cadence 3:2 24fps film

5

5

Pass

Scrolling Horizontal

10

0

Fail

Scrolling Rolling

10

10

Pass

Total Points

130

53



Comments on HQV Testing

The fact that we're even running HQV on a receiver warrants notation. In this changing playing field of A/V components it's getting harder and harder to tell who's doing what. I mean, is it your DVD player, receiver, or display that's scaling that video? With so many redundancies it's getting easier and easier to get lazy and not take the time to see who does the best job at each task. For example, your DVD player may do a better job of deinterlacing than your display, but your display will be able to handle the subtle picture adjustments to tweak your final picture. And do you want to feed it 480i or 1080i? You see? There are lots of choices. With the Sony STR-DA7100ES scoring a 53, it would be my choice to ensure that it is not deinterlacing your video - but at the same time realize that this is a higher score than other receivers I've tested that sport video processing. Send it 480p and disable Progressive Out or pass through 480i and see if your display does a better job. Better yet - test all of your options and then make the call. Sound like a pain? It is - but it's worth it.