Skip to content. Skip to navigation
You are here: Home Pro Reviews Projectors Sanyo PLV-Z5 LCD Projector Review Sanyo PLV-Z5 LCD Projector- Calibration
 

Sanyo PLV-Z5 LCD Projector- Calibration

by Clint DeBoer last modified March 02, 2007

Remote Control (CXVT)

The only differences between this remote and the one belonging to the PLV-Z4 is the presence of toggling HDMI and component video buttons. The second Component video button’s space is now occupied by a direct-access VGA button, leaving the final position available for an “Info” button which activates the on-screen menu showing the projector’s status and input source. The downside to this is that you no longer have direct control over each input and programming universal remote controls may take some additional thought or workarounds.

Prosremote-comparison.jpg

  • Fully backlit
  • “Light” button on the remote glows in the dark
  • Extensive Image Controls
  • “Freeze” control

Cons

  • Lost discrete inputs in favor of space-saving toggles for HDMI and component
  • No automatic backlight with first button push

Projector CalibrationPLV-Z5-CIE.jpg

The Sanyo PLV-Z5 did exceptionally well out of the box. I was given an “off-the-shelf” unit, so there’s little chance that anything was pre-tweaked before arrival. When I put this projector up for calibration I found that it was in really great shape without any tweaking. Even black and white levels were almost spot on in my room (a huge improvement over the PLV-Z4). The CIE chart showed that color capability was exceptional with only green coming in just below the REC-709 HDTV target levels.

Here are some of the before and after measurements as shown by the Datacolor ColorFacts Professional 6.0 software:

Before Calibration

After Calibration

PLV-Z5-RGB-b4.jpg

PLV-Z5-RGB.jpg

This is not bad at all. You can see why the Pure Cinema’s default image is a bit on the warm side. Blue and green track very well, with green staying below red and blue – preferred over it being the hottest color.

After calibration the results look even better. This projector dialed in very quickly – which is a welcome change from the endless back and forth we typically work with in menu systems.

PLV-Z5-luma-b4.jpg

PLV-Z5-luma.jpg

This won’t be very exciting, but the luminance graph is nearly dead on.

After calibration there is only a minimum change in the luminance graph. I’m not complaining.

PLV-Z5-temp-b4.jpg

PLV-Z5-temp.jpg

Here we were very surprised and pleased. There is a bump that gradually brings the color temperature back down to near-D65 around 80IRE. And this is without any calibration – not bad.

After our adjustments, the color temperature jumped almost uniformly across the board, but this brought the overall levels closer to what we were looking for.

Calibration Notes

I have to say that calibration is almost not needed on this projector – and that’s refreshing. We experienced one of the quickest calibration sessions ever, taking just a few back and forth adjustments of red and green to dial in the image to acceptable levels. I especially liked how the menu system remembered where we were throughout the process, so had merely to “right-arrow” our way back through the menu to make additional tweaks to the RGB gain and offset levels.

Just for Fun – Color Temperature and Output Levels

We put up our datacolor Spyder2 colorimeter and cycled through all of the PLV-Z5’s modes in order to see how this affected light output and color temperature. Here are the results:

  • Brilliant Cinema: 62.5 cd/m2 at 6550K
  • Creative Cinema: 48 cd/m2 at 6700K
  • Pure Cinema: 30 cd/m2 at 6250K
  • Natural: 54 cd/m2 at 7000K
  • Living: 63 cd/m2 at 6800K
  • Dynamic: 134 cd/m2 at 9050K
  • Vivid: 134 cd/m2 at 9050K

What did I learn from this experiment? Well, Dynamic and Vivid not only looked the same on our screen, they measured the same as well. Pure Cinema, while more accurate, can certainly be supplanted by Creative Cinema if you’re looking to eek out more light from the Sanyo. The other modes were not particularly useful to me since I was either looking for the brightest possible image, or one that was accurate to film.

Audioholics/HQV Bench Testing Summary of Test Results

Perfect Score is 130
Sanyo PLV-Z5 Benchmark Score: 79 (not bad, and better than many displays and source components)

Test

Max
Points

Film

Pass/Fail

Color Bar

10

10

Pass

Jaggies #1

5

3

Pass

Jaggies #2

5

1

Pass

Flag

10

10

Pass

Detail

10

10

Pass

Noise

10

10

Pass

Motion adaptive Noise Reduction

10

5

Pass

Film Detail

10

10

Pass

Cadence 2:2 Video

5

0

Fail

Cadence 2:2:2:4 DV Cam

5

0

Fail

Cadence 2:3:3:2 DV Cam

5

0

Fail

Cadence 3:2:3:2:2 Vari-speed

5

0

Fail

Cadence 5:5 Animation

5

0

Fail

Cadence 6:4 Animation

5

0

Fail

Cadence 8:7 animation

5

0

Fail

Cadence 3:2 24fps film

5

5

Pass

Scrolling Horizontal

10

5

Pass

Scrolling Rolling

10

10

Pass

Total Points

130

79


Source component was the Denon DVD-3930CI DVD Player.

Comments on Benchmark Testing

Set that progressive mode to ‘Film’ if you are sending an interlaced signal to the Sanyo (the default is ‘L1’ which doesn’t do very well on DVDs or 480i [interlaced] sources). I found that for users of older DVD players, this projector does excellent work at deinterlacing and scaling, so send it 480i, unless you have a high-performance DVD player. The Sharpness control seemed best when set at 0.

The Moving Zone plate 2-3 tests passed with flying colors this time around. I’m not sure what Sanyo did with the new model, but it seemed to fare a lot better in terms of handling rapid deinterlacing during horizontal, vertical and diagonal movement.

 

Recent Forum Posts:

Post Reply
The Dukester posts on January 30, 2007 08:07
I guess the $64,000 question is how does it stack up vs the Panasonic PT-AX100U, bang-for-the-buck-wise? Seems like the Panny gives perhaps a tad more filmlike picture and higher overall performance, but the Sanyo has the auto lense cover & panel cleaner, plus is $500 cheaper. Seems like that makes the race almost neck and neck.

Also to compare apples and oranges, how it stacks up with the Optoma HD72 DLP that is in the same price range.
Rob Babcock posts on January 30, 2007 00:37
I guess the $64,000 question is how does it stack up vs the Panasonic PT-AX100U, bang-for-the-buck-wise? Seems like the Panny gives perhaps a tad more filmlike picture and higher overall performance, but the Sanyo has the auto lense cover & panel cleaner, plus is $500 cheaper. Seems like that makes the race almost neck and neck.
Clint DeBoer posts on January 29, 2007 22:18
And since we received our sample from ProjectorPeople off the shelf - it definitely wasn't tweaked, so my assessment should be accurate - at least for those who share my other criteria.

It's 2007, though - all projectors should be pretty flat by now when in Cinema mode... at least on a unity gain screen in a light-controlled environment.
Intradio posts on January 29, 2007 21:26
Well, after reading many posts, mostly speculation, about how bad the out-of-the-box calibration is, on the Z4 and the Z5 would probably be no better, it is refreshing to read a review that confirms my experience.

I don't know about the Z4, but I have been super satisfied with my Z5 right out of the box. The only adjustment I have made was to turn down the color a tad for the component input. That's probably because I use it for the HD satellite TV box. I use my upconverting oppo to feed DVD's via HDMI and the detail, color, sharpness, etc. is beautiful. My screen is a 100 inch Da Lite da-mat, unity gain. HT is in the basement with pretty good, but not perfect, light control. I wouldn't recommend going bigger than 100 inch unless it's a higher gain, or you can make your HT totally dark.

I have 104 hrs on it now which is long enough to notice any bugs and I'm happy to say there is none. The review is a mirror image of my experience, so far, with my Z5. Needles to say, I'm a happy camper.

Live long & Prosper,
Intradio
patnshan posts on January 29, 2007 15:15
HendersonD
Both of these projectors have gotten great reviews. I have a light controlled room where I will be installing a 110" diagonal SMX Screen that has a gain of 1.16. Seating distance is 11'.

What are the differences between these two that will help me make a decision? Any thoughts on which of these two I should purchase?

Dave


There are HUGE threads on AVS forum discussing the merits of these two and others comparable.
I am trying to decide myself which to get.
Pat
Post Reply
 
Join our Newsletter for News & Deals