Skip to content. Skip to navigation
You are here: Home Pro Reviews Projectors Planar PD7150 DLP Projector Review Planar PD7150 Benchmark Tests
 

Planar PD7150 Benchmark Tests

by Clint DeBoer last modified March 07, 2007

Perfect Score is 130
Planar PD7150 Benchmark Score: 75 (The Planar should be considered a suitable video processor for almost all uses. If you happen to have a high end player, simply feed progressive out of that device and the projector will handle the scaling of the input signal to its native resolution)

Test

Max
Points

Results

Pass/Fail

Color Bar

10

10

Pass

Jaggies #1

5

5

Pass

Jaggies #2

5

5

Pass

Flag

10

10

Pass

Detail

10

10

Pass

Noise

10

0

Fail

Motion adaptive Noise Reduction

10

0

Fail

Film Detail

10

10

Pass

Cadence 2:2 Video

5

0

Fail

Cadence 2:2:2:4 DV Cam

5

0

Fail

Cadence 2:3:3:2 DV Cam

5

0

Fail

Cadence 3:2:3:2:2 Vari-speed

5

0

Pass

Cadence 5:5 Animation

5

0

Fail

Cadence 6:4 Animation

5

0

Fail

Cadence 8:7 animation

5

0

Fail

Cadence 3:2 24fps film

5

5

Pass

Scrolling Horizontal

10

10

Pass

Scrolling Rolling

10

10

Pass

Total Points

130

75

 

Comments on Benchmark Testing

The Planar PD7150 does not support true 480i input via DVI-D, so all deinterlacing and video processing tests were done by feeding the projector a 480i signal via its component inputs. When feeding 480i via DVI-D, the projector converted the image to 1440x480, presumably line-doubling it from what we saw. Deinterlacing was not performed and the resulting picture would fail all detail and deinterlacing tests we had on hand. This probably isn't significant for most users, but should be noted. We utilized a Denon DVD-3930CI for our 480i component source inputs since it provides pristine interlaced component output.

Overall, this projector performs above par where it counts. Jaggie reduction was excellent, among the best we've seen, in both testing and practical examples. The flag test, for example, passed with flying colors (no pun intended). The Film Detail test passed with full credits, but without any leeway, the timing was just in time to get full credit. This is, however, an unflagged test and definitely shows that the Pixelworks 2:3 film deinterlacing system is an intelligent one.

It seems that failing the noise reduction tests is becoming a new trend. While many new discs are doing better and better jobs of mastering content and reducing practical noise, there are still a lot of places where good quality noise reduction is appreciated - when it's not overdone. The PD7150 did nothing noticeable for noise reduction.

The PD7150 passed the AVIA Pro 2-3 Moving Zone Plate tests, but failed the Standard and 2-2 Zone Plate tests. I have not seen many systems pass the non 2-3 tests. The Deinterlacing settings had no affect on performance in this area (except of course for 2-3 where you need to have the 2-3 film mode engaged.)

We tested for rainbow effect (RBE) using the AVIA Pro Rainbow Dither test and found the PD7150 to be pretty good unless you darted your eyes around the screen. As with many other DLP systems, if you have a “white on black” shape or edge and you dart your eyes quickly across the viewing area, you’re going to see rainbows (if you are susceptible to this). In a lot of ways this is like the man who walks into the Doctor's office and says, "Doc, it hurts when I do this." Well, then, don't do that.

 

Recent Forum Posts:

Post Reply
E-A-G-L-E-S posts on October 17, 2008 10:37
This is one fantastic 720p 1 chip DC3 DLP PJ!
The Dukester posts on October 14, 2008 11:30
Thanks for the review. The Planar 1080p's are on my short list. Any chance of seeing an 8150 or 8130 review? I'd really like to see how these stack up against the new JVC's coming out and the Sony's. Too bad there are no dealers close to me to see any of these.
Clint DeBoer posts on October 14, 2008 09:08
You might want to read this article:

http://www.audioholics.com/tweaks/calibrate-your-system/hdmi-black-levels-xvycc-rgb [audioholics.com]

It will give you some good info on why proper levels are important and how to ensure you get them correct.
Grayson73 posts on October 14, 2008 08:21
White Enhance, if I recall correctly, enabled whiter than white response, regardless of gamma setting. I don't typically retain calibration settings since most people's rooms and systems are different from mine.

So you recommend that it is always "on", right? Why is it good to have "whiter than white"?
Clint DeBoer posts on October 13, 2008 18:42
White Enhance, if I recall correctly, enabled whiter than white response, regardless of gamma setting. I don't typically retain calibration settings since most people's rooms and systems are different from mine.
Post Reply
 
Join our Newsletter for News & Deals