PT-AX100U Menu System

By

The Panasonic's menu system isn't much changed from the previous version found in the PT-AE900U. Changes include additional options for the added Noise Reduction options and new Light Harmonizer features. I won't rehash the menu system since I went through it at length in the PT-AE900U review, but I'll show the two menu systems here for comparison, along with any pertinent commentary on the changes:

PICTURE Menu
The Picture menu is nearly identical except that the PT-AX100U moves the noise reduction options to the Advanced Menu and splits out an option for MPEG noise reduction. "Memory" slots are now referred to as "Favorites" and the "Light Harmonizer" option is visible near the bottom of the screen (Auto/Manual/Off).

PT-AE900U menu system PT-AX100U-menu1.jpg

OPTION Menu
The Option menu combines the Desk/Ceiling and Front/Rear projection options into one setting that cycles through all four possible mounting options. An "HDMI Signal Level" apparently adjusts the HDMI color range from 16-235 to 0-255 (essentially washing out your image). The rest is about the same except for a few changes in nomenclature.

PT-AE900U option menu PT-AX100U-menu4.jpg

Color Management

In addition to getting your RGB colors correctly calibrated with gain. Cut and gamma settings, Panasonic also offers something they call Custom Color Management that actually allows you to perform color correction on-screen using the actual projected image. While not new (the PT-AE900U featured it) it's a nifty feature, though not one that I have yet found a particular use for (other than making some funny on-screen effects). The system does work, as noted by my photos below which show Discovery Channel's Jeff Corwin's red coat being turned pink with hardly any effect on the rest of the picture:

PT-AX100U-color-B4.jpg PT-AX100U-color-after.jpg

Light Harmonizer with Ambient Light Sensor

PT-AX100U-top.jpg The Light Harmonizer system works via an ambient light sensor which sites on the top of the Panasonic projector (just in front of the navigation controls). This sensor evaluates the amount of luminance in the room, checks it against the source video, and then adjusts the gamma curve to compensate in a way that produces the brightest picture. The system does not appear to affect lamp power settings or even the dynamic iris, but it does produce a noticeable alteration should the ambient light suddenly change in the viewing environment. After trying different settings, I found that this was pretty much a setting that I wanted to leave "off" due to the fact that I don't like my gamma settings changing on a regular basis - something that is likely to happen if your room reflects enough light back from the screen. You may want to play with it in your environment, but I'd just as soon save a few Favorite settings for easy recall during Day or Night viewing.

PT-AX100-Gamma3.jpg PT-AX100-Gamma2.jpg PT-AX100-Gamma1.jpg

Calibration - Getting Those Black Levels Right!

The PT-AX100U projector absolutely nails reds and blues, but greens tend to be a bit desaturated - not atypical for this type of display. I measured a "real world" contrast ratio of 1350:1 - awesome! This contrast ratio didn't change much after calibration since the white levels were spot on and the black levels were only adjusted by a couple of points on the settings bar.

We again utilized datacolor's ColorFacts Professional 6.0 software to calibrate and measure the grayscale response of the PT-AX100U. What we found was surprising and showed that Panasonic is paying attention and putting out a truly excellent product that requires virtually no initial calibration in order to look very very good. This is another difference from the PT-AE900U which needed a considerable amount of calibration in order to look its best.

Panasonic seems to be moving forward and we like the direction they are taking:

Before Calibration

After Calibration

PT-AX100U-RGB-B4.jpg

PT-AX100U-RGB.jpg

You're looking at the Cinema1 mode with no calibration. Red and green are nearly spot-on with blue lending a cool effect above 60IRE. You know what? I'll take it - this lends itself to a fantastic picture compared to other models I've seen.

Calibration was touchy, red and green were very sensitive and the projector quickly ran into a point where I had to decrease the sensitivity of ColorFacts in order to proceed. Here Green and blue are locked and red seems to be the dissenting color of choice. I'm sure that with additional tweaking I could have gotten it closer to target - but is it worth the trouble?

PT-AX100U-luminance-B4.jpg

PT-AX100U-luminance.jpg

The initial luminance histogram looked decent 舰

After calibration we increased black level resolution a bit and got the curve even closer to its mark.

PT-AX100U-temperature-B4.jpg

PT-AX100U-temperature.jpg

Color temperature rose with the IRE level upon our initial measurements.

Once tweaked, the color temp stayed fairly even.

This is a marked improvement over the default state of the PT-AE900U and represents a concerted effort to bring consumers a well-calibrated projector that needs very little tweaking in order to produce a fantastic picture. Measured contrast was quite impressive and this is exactly the type of results we like to see "pre calibration".

Audioholics/HQV Bench Testing Summary of Test Results

Perfect Score is 130
Panasonic PT-AX100U Benchmark Score: 90 (yowsa, this is a great score and a marked improvement from the PT-AE900U which scored a 71)

Test

Max
Points

Component
Results

Component
PassFail

Color Bar

10

10

Pass

Jaggies #1

5

5

Pass

Jaggies #2

5

5

Pass

Flag

10

5

Pass

Detail

10

10

Pass

Noise

10

5

Pass

Motion adaptive Noise Reduction

10

0

Fail

Film Detail

10

10

Pass

Cadence 2:2 Video

5

5

Pass

Cadence 2:2:2:4 DV Cam

5

5

Pass

Cadence 2:3:3:2 DV Cam

5

0

Fail

Cadence 3:2:3:2:2 Vari-speed

5

0

Fail

Cadence 5:5 Animation

5

0

Fail

Cadence 6:4 Animation

5

5

Pass

Cadence 8:7 animation

5

0

Fail

Cadence 3:2 24fps film

5

5

Pass

Scrolling Horizontal

10

10

Pass

Scrolling Rolling

10

10

Pass

Total Points


130

90



Comments on HQV Testing

The HQV results of the Panasonic projector may be the most surprising thing we saw in the entire review. I was not expecting much of a change in this area, but the PT-AX100U surprised me with a stellar benchmark score of 90. This is no slouch and I really appreciated the ability of this projector to delivery excellent results with standard definition content which it deftly upconverted to 720p.

 

Post Reply
Rinny posts on December 21, 2007 22:54
Hello having a problems with projector PT-AX100U. There's a green dot in the picture 12" in DIA. at the top of the screen. Any Cule's on what this is or to fix...Thanks:o
Rinny posts on December 21, 2007 22:53
Hello having a problems with projector PT-AX100U. There's a green dot in the picture 12" in DIA. at the top of the screen. Any Cule's on what this is or to fix...Thanks
Pell posts on December 17, 2007 23:16
I owned one of these for a while, and I must say it was absolutely incredible. We recently moved and no longer am able to use it (we moved to a loft so theres WAY to much light now) so we sold it.

To be honest though, at this point and with the street prices of the 1080p panasonic projectors I would save up some more pennies and go with the 1080p to help 'futureproof' a bit. Either way , kick *** projector!
patnshan posts on December 07, 2007 15:28
I have the AX100U with about 550 hours on it. I have not had one problem with it at all. I can highly recommend it from my experience. The 200U would be the current model, and it seems to have had some of the problems others noted, corrected.

Pat
basil posts on December 07, 2007 10:54
I was about to rush out and purchase a 100u but read on the Net very disturbing comments by several users who claimed that after +- 400 hours their machine developed the same problem .....shutting down and refusing to power-up....They each claimed that it was later found that there was a serious design flaw and faulted function with the iris. It was stated that Panasonic were very churlish about their problem and apparently weren't prepared to comment or admit that there was a design flaw in the operating of the iris.
Although each stated that when they worked they were excellent, each had the same bad experience and were met with a poor,uncaring response from Panasonic. They went on to strongly advise the readers to stay away from that model.
Can you comment on your experience,dispel these claims or confirm them?

Basil
Post Reply
 
Submit News!