DIY Cable Faceoff - Measurements and Value
Resistance (Rs)
The results of the resistance measurements are shown in Table 3, as previously stated, the higher the rank, the better. I’ve only shown Rs for each frequency. Rs is the AC resistance at the measured frequency plus the DC resistance.
|
Manufacturer |
Model |
Rs (Ohms/Ft) |
RANK |
|||
|
100 Hz |
1kHz |
10kHz |
AVG |
|||
|
Alpha |
85104CY |
0.00208 |
0.00213 |
0.00228 |
0.00216 |
9.858 |
|
Carol |
10/3 |
0.00204 |
0.00205 |
0.00206 |
0.00205 |
10.000 |
|
Carol |
12/4 T1 |
0.00329 |
0.00329 |
0.00341 |
0.00333 |
8.322 |
|
CAT 5 |
V1 |
0.00269 |
0.00269 |
0.00269 |
0.00269 |
9.161 |
|
CAT 5 |
V2 |
0.00326 |
0.00326 |
0.00344 |
0.00332 |
8.336 |
|
CAT 5 |
V3 |
0.00213 |
0.00218 |
0.00224 |
0.00218 |
9.824 |
|
CAT 5 |
V4 |
0.00216 |
0.00215 |
0.00231 |
0.00221 |
9.797 |
|
CAT 5 |
V5 |
0.00222 |
0.00227 |
0.00227 |
0.00225 |
9.736 |
|
Generic (Lowes) |
10/4 |
0.00202 |
0.00210 |
0.00232 |
0.00215 |
9.870 |
|
Generic (Lowes) |
12/4 |
0.00325 |
0.00325 |
0.00345 |
0.00332 |
8.345 |
|
Monster |
MCX-1S |
0.00861 |
0.00882 |
0.00937 |
0.00893 |
1.000 |
|
Parts Express |
100-768 |
0.00521 |
0.00536 |
0.00536 |
0.00531 |
5.742 |
|
Sound King |
V1 |
0.00207 |
0.00222 |
0.00222 |
0.00217 |
9.850 |
|
Sound King |
V2 |
0.00210 |
0.00224 |
0.00224 |
0.00220 |
9.808 |
|
Sound King |
V3 |
0.00210 |
0.00224 |
0.00224 |
0.00220 |
9.808 |
|
Sound King |
V4 |
0.00210 |
0.00215 |
0.00217 |
0.00214 |
9.884 |
|
Woods |
HD |
0.00333 |
0.00343 |
0.00345 |
0.00340 |
8.232 |
|
Carol |
12/4 T2 |
0.00329 |
0.00329 |
0.00341 |
0.00333 |
NA |
|
Carol |
12/4 T3 |
0.00329 |
0.00329 |
0.00341 |
0.00333 |
NA |
TABLE 2
CABLE RESISTANCE (Ohms/Ft)
Editorial Note
The 1-10 scale ranks the cable resistance for each cable. The higher the #, the lower the resistance or the better performance the cable will yield in this respect.
Note, that as expected, the photo lamp test (T2) and the pink noise test (T3), did not affect the resistance of the conductors in a 4 conductor cable. Notice also, the high resistance of the Monster cable, this is characteristic of a 16 AWG or smaller wire.
Capacitance (Cp)
|
Manufacturer |
Model |
Cp (picofarads/Ft) |
RANK |
|||
|
100 Hz |
1kHz |
10kHz |
AVG |
|||
|
Alpha |
85104CY |
45.241 |
41.959 |
38.097 |
41.7657 |
1.364 |
|
Carol |
10/3 |
37.625 |
35.063 |
32.250 |
34.9792 |
3.439 |
|
Carol |
12/4 T1 |
27.808 |
25.769 |
24.654 |
26.0769 |
6.161 |
|
CAT 5 |
V1 |
26.915 |
26.863 |
26.056 |
26.6115 |
5.997 |
|
CAT 5 |
V2 |
24.825 |
23.776 |
23.310 |
23.9705 |
6.805 |
|
CAT 5 |
V3 |
38.105 |
42.663 |
41.105 |
40.6246 |
1.713 |
|
CAT 5 |
V4 |
32.000 |
32.222 |
31.333 |
31.8519 |
4.395 |
|
CAT 5 |
V5 |
40.432 |
44.865 |
43.568 |
42.9550 |
1.000 |
|
Generic (Lowes) |
10/4 |
16.000 |
18.600 |
17.500 |
17.3667 |
8.824 |
|
Generic (Lowes) |
12/4 |
15.600 |
18.450 |
17.350 |
17.1333 |
8.896 |
|
Monster |
MCX-1S |
29.720 |
35.710 |
34.890 |
33.4400 |
3.909 |
|
Parts Express |
100-768 |
22.400 |
21.020 |
20.000 |
21.1400 |
7.670 |
|
Sound King |
V1 |
22.900 |
20.800 |
18.730 |
20.8100 |
7.771 |
|
Sound King |
V2 |
21.128 |
19.897 |
18.154 |
19.7265 |
8.103 |
|
Sound King |
V3 |
12.410 |
14.626 |
13.528 |
13.5214 |
10.000 |
|
Sound King |
V4 |
20.886 |
19.697 |
18.314 |
19.6324 |
8.131 |
|
Woods |
HD |
33.320 |
35.000 |
32.160 |
33.4933 |
3.893 |
|
Carol |
12/4 T2 |
26.000 |
26.192 |
24.962 |
25.718 |
NA |
|
Carol |
12/4 T3 |
28.231 |
25.962 |
24.769 |
26.321 |
NA |
TABLE 3
CABLE CAPACITANCE (pF/foot)
Editorial Note
The 1-10 scale ranks the cable capacitance for each cable. The higher the #, the lower the capacitance or the better performance the cable will yield in this respect.
Several thing to notice from these results are the very good performance of the standard off the shelf power cables. While the Woods extension cord does not appear to be exemplary in this respect, it is comparable to the more popularly known Monster cable. The two cables I purchased at Lowes really impress though, as does the Sound King. Bare in mind the Sound King V3 is a three wire braid and the V4 is a 4 wire chain braid. It seems that inexpensive wire rules here. A final note, the photo lamp test (T2) and pink noise test (T3) do not appear to have a minor impact on capacitance, but this is also within the realm of standard meter error.
Inductance (Ls)
|
Manufacturer |
Model |
Ls (microHenries/Ft) |
RANK |
|||
|
100 Hz |
1kHz |
10kHz |
AVG |
|||
|
Alpha |
85104CY |
0.217 |
0.210 |
0.215 |
0.214 |
4.332 |
|
Carol |
10/3 |
0.262 |
0.260 |
0.253 |
0.258 |
2.393 |
|
Carol |
12/4 T1 |
0.256 |
0.254 |
0.251 |
0.254 |
2.592 |
|
CAT 5 |
V1 |
0.112 |
0.095 |
0.104 |
0.104 |
9.162 |
|
CAT 5 |
V2 |
0.115 |
0.132 |
0.126 |
0.124 |
8.264 |
|
CAT 5 |
V3 |
0.097 |
0.096 |
0.089 |
0.094 |
9.587 |
|
CAT 5 |
V4 |
0.123 |
0.122 |
0.116 |
0.120 |
8.432 |
|
CAT 5 |
V5 |
0.088 |
0.086 |
0.080 |
0.085 |
10.000 |
|
Generic (Lowes) |
10/4 |
0.256 |
0.255 |
0.251 |
0.254 |
2.582 |
|
Generic (Lowes) |
12/4 |
0.290 |
0.282 |
0.284 |
0.285 |
1.208 |
|
Monster |
MCX-1S |
0.195 |
0.192 |
0.186 |
0.191 |
5.340 |
|
Parts Express |
100-768 |
0.218 |
0.203 |
0.210 |
0.210 |
4.489 |
|
Sound King |
V1 |
0.210 |
0.196 |
0.203 |
0.203 |
4.810 |
|
Sound King |
V2 |
0.217 |
0.215 |
0.209 |
0.214 |
4.327 |
|
Sound King |
V3 |
0.258 |
0.246 |
0.253 |
0.252 |
2.641 |
|
Sound King |
V4 |
0.299 |
0.281 |
0.289 |
0.290 |
1.000 |
|
Woods |
HD |
0.190 |
0.190 |
0.183 |
0.187 |
5.493 |
|
Carol |
12/4 T2 |
0.254 |
0.253 |
0.249 |
0.252 |
NA |
|
Carol |
12/4 T3 |
0.256 |
0.247 |
0.249 |
0.251 |
NA |
TABLE 4
CABLE INDUCTANCE (μH/Ft)
Editorial Note
The 1-10 scale ranks the cable inductance for each cable. The higher the #, the lower the inductance or the better performance the cable will yield in this respect.
Cable
Metric Definitions
|
CAT 5 rules, as expected. Extension cords almost rule as not expected. I wonder why the braided Cat 5 wire performed so much better than the braided Sound King. Let’s not start the argument that Cat 5 is designed for low inductance, especially since the way I made the cables - each of the eight wires inside the sheath acted as one thick wire, the same way as the Sound King cable. It would be nice to hear some knowledgeable opinions or even swags. Finally though, the Monster cable is at least looking mediocre.
Editorial Note
By
braiding multiple conductors in close proximity you have taken
advantage of mutual inductance by cancellation of self inductance to
minimize the overall inductance of the cable. For more detailed
information on cable inductance check out our article: Calculating Cable Inductance
Value and Price
|
Manufacturer |
Model |
Price/Ft |
Rank |
|
Alpha |
85104CY |
$16.00 |
1.000 |
|
Carol |
10/3 |
$0.66 |
9.756 |
|
Carol |
12/4 T1 |
$0.66 |
9.756 |
|
CAT 5 |
V1 |
$0.26 |
9.985 |
|
CAT 5 |
V2 |
$0.23 |
10.000 |
|
CAT 5 |
V3 |
$0.37 |
9.923 |
|
CAT 5 |
V4 |
$0.33 |
9.943 |
|
CAT 5 |
V5 |
$0.32 |
9.948 |
|
Generic (Lowes) |
10/4 |
$1.74 |
9.140 |
|
Generic (Lowes) |
12/4 |
$1.46 |
9.300 |
|
Monster |
MCX-1S |
$3.75 |
7.992 |
|
Parts Express |
100-768 |
$0.34 |
9.939 |
|
Sound King |
V1 |
$0.72 |
9.722 |
|
Sound King |
V2 |
$0.74 |
9.712 |
|
Sound King |
V3 |
$1.11 |
9.501 |
|
Sound King |
V4 |
$1.56 |
9.244 |
|
Woods |
HD |
$0.64 |
9.768 |
TABLE 5
CABLE COST ($/Ft)
Editorial Note
The 1-10 scale ranks the cable cost for each cable. The higher the #, the lower the cost or the better value to the consumer.
The
cost per foot shown in Table 5 is based on one cable for one channel.
So you will need to double the cost for a pair of speaker cables. The
thing to observe here is that the least expensive cables require the
most work. Do you have any idea how tiring it is to neatly braid Cat
5? Also notice that all cables except the Monster and Alpha have
rankings above 9. That is because the cost of the Alpha wire is so
much more than all others. In my field (mechanical engineering) we
would almost call this a wash. Yes the cable from Lowes is almost 8
times as expensive as the cheapest Cat 5 variant, but you just have to
put connectors of you choice on the Lowes cable - no assembly
required. When these cables are compared to other esoteric cables (see Table 7) that $16/foot may not seem so expensive anymore.
