Emotiva UPA-500 Five Channel Power Amplifier Introduction
When a box unexpectedly showed up at my door from Emotiva, I thought it was a preamp, given its unusually compact size. Instead I was surprised to discover it was their new UPA-500 five channel power amplifier. I’ve never been able to one arm an Emotiva up my flight of steps to the Audioholics Showcase Theater Room for testing until now. This little guy weighs less than a mid-fi receiver (about 23 lbs), making it very manageable to lug around and install in tight spaces. But can it pack a punch? Rated at 80wpc x 5 into 8 ohms and 120wpc into 4 ohms it certainly sounds like it does on paper but, let’s find out.
Design Overview
The UPA-500 is a traditional class A/B amplifier
design utilizing a single large 350VA toroidal power transformer and
large capacitance bank for its power supply. Having a singular
larger sized power supply is an advantage that allows the amplifier
to deliver more power to any given channel if the output devices can
handle it. This, in turn, provides more available headroom, which
is critical for effortlessly producing large dynamics and peaks in
music and movies. Emotiva claims the UPA-500 has 40,000uF total
power supply capacitance and, peering under the hood, you could see
their claim is correct with the four 10,000uF, 63V parts connected in
parallel. 63V parts provide more than enough margin above the rail
voltage needed to hit the 80wpc rating that Emotiva is claiming. The
amp module topology is very similar to its bigger XPA series sibling,
but in a more compact surface mount form factor. Emotiva also
employs a trick circuit that senses the line voltage and
automatically switches between 120VAC and 220VAC. Why more amplifier
manufacturers don’t do this is beyond me. The UPA-500, like all
Emotiva amplifiers, has the CE mark which is a rigorous international
safety and regulatory test to ensure the amp will cause no harm to
your home or interfere with any of your household electronics or
pacemaker (should you have one).
Emotiva
UPA-500 Back view
The back view of the UPA-500 is a bit pedestrian, but the connector spacing is well laid out. The speaker 5-way binding posts and analog RCA connections are all spaced apart 1.5". Try tugging on any of the connectors and you will notice how firmly planted they are into the back panel. Emotiva really knows how to build a durable amp. The UPA-500 doesn’t have balanced inputs, but would you expect otherwise at this price? Most users considering this amp are mating it with a budget A/V receiver or pre/pro that also doesn’t feature balanced connectors. There is a 3.5mm mini-plug trigger input compatible for 5-12V systems and the UPA-500 comes with a detachable two-prong 18AWG power cord.

Emotiva
UPA-500 front panel View
The front panel sports Emotiva's same industrial look found in all of their current products. It includes their infamous silver power switch embroidered backlit with their logo (yellow for 'off' state, blue for 'on' state). There are five defeatable LED indicators (one for each channel) that illuminate blue when the amplifier is operating under normal conditions and flash red when all hell breaks loose. I was unable to create such a fault condition in my testing until I accidentally shorted the amp to the ground plate of my lab's 8-ohm test resistors and attempted to conduct a power sweep. Emotiva states that this amplifier is protected from all fault conditions which, to me, is very important and often overlooked by product engineers. I can't tell you how many times I've swapped cables during comparative listening tests where I accidentally shorted the leads. On competently designed amplifiers such as the UPA-500, the amplifier will simply shut down and protect itself and the foolish consumer (or in my case, reviewer) who forget to shut it off before swapping speaker connections. On poorly designed amplifiers, they will either blow output devices or... um, catch fire. In the 12+ years of reviewing amplifiers, I am proud to say I've only blown up one not so well engineered amplifier, which is a testament to all of other brands engineering their products correctly with consumer safety being of utmost importance. Of course, I blew up three samples of that one particular amp, but, moving on...
Set-Up
The UPA-500 was as easy as pie to move around. In fact, I consider it a one-hander amp - even for users ridden with back issues like myself. I connected the UPA-500 to my Marantz SR6004 A/V receiver and Yamaha MCX-2000 MusicCAST and tried it out on a pair of Infinity P363’s I had in for review along with a set of older JBL Pro III surround speakers. This represented a pretty tough load for the UPA-500, since all four speakers are rated at 4-ohms. All speaker cables were Kimber 8PR's along with Impact Acoustics Sonicwave interconnects. The listening tests were conducted in the Audioholics Showcase Theater Room which is a moderately acoustically treated 6,000 ft^3 room courtesy of Auralex Acoustics.
KEW;908917
I'd have to disagree with this statement somewhat. I frequently see AVR's (and HTiB especially) advertised as a 500 watt receiver/system because the rating is 5 channels and 100WPC. As an example:
RXV371 | Yamaha 500-Watt 3D 5.1 Channel Home Theater Receiver | hhgregg [hhgregg.com]
In all fairness, I believe it is the retailer and not the manufacturer that does this; however, it is easy to see where any reasonable person would presume a receiver could produce the spec with ACD.
Actually there is no disagreement in this regard because when I mention AVRs, in my mind (I know no one can read my mind) I am thinking mid range ones such as the Yamaha RX-A or V 2XXX, Denon AVR-3XXX and up. Also I said I had not seen many, but I have certainly seen some, just not too many, that advertise in ways that people could be misled.. And I always refer to the manufacturer's ads, not resellers.
You are so right about it is not the manufacturer who does this, not in this case but again I have seen some who does though.
The following is copied from yamaha.ca for the RX-V373:
Amplifier Section
Channel 5.1
Rated Output Power (1kHz, 1ch driven)
100W (8ohms, 0.9% THD)
Rated Output Power (1kHz, 2ch driven)
85W (8ohms, 0.9% THD)
Dynamic Power per Channel (8/6/4/2 ohms)
110/130/160/180W
Never said anything about ACD.
PENG;908916
Amps, yes but I have not seen too many AVR advertised their rated watts with all channels driven. I am sure some do but not many. From honesty stand point, I agree they should do what they say they can do though as Gene said it is not realistic. I also think it is not practical, border on stupid, to do say 80WX7 ACD instead of aiming to achieve 2X120W but only 60X7, as the latter will perform better in real life situations.
I'd have to disagree with this statement somewhat. I frequently see AVR's (and HTiB especially) advertised as a 500 watt receiver/system because the rating is 5 channels and 100WPC. As an example:
RXV371 | Yamaha 500-Watt 3D 5.1 Channel Home Theater Receiver | hhgregg [hhgregg.com]
In all fairness, I believe it is the retailer and not the manufacturer that does this; however, it is easy to see where any reasonable person would presume a receiver could produce the spec with ACD.
sharkman;908886
Hi Gene,
If an amp is advertised at 80 watts by 5 channels, then it should be able to put out 80 watts x 5 channels to my way of thinking.
Amps, yes but I have not seen too many AVR advertised their rated watts with all channels driven. I am sure some do but not many. From honesty stand point, I agree they should do what they say they can do though as Gene said it is not realistic. I also think it is not practical, border on stupid, to do say 80WX7 ACD instead of aiming to achieve 2X120W but only 60X7, as the latter will perform better in real life situations.
sharkman;908886
Hi Gene,
What these ACD full bandwidth tests do is demonstrate whether the amp in question can do what the manufacturer says it can do, that's why I like them. I may be out of touch, but us little guys have no way of verifying what these manufacturers are saying their products can do. I like Reagan's old line, "Trust, but verify". If an amp is advertised at 80 watts by 5 channels, then it should be able to put out 80 watts x 5 channels to my way of thinking.
These amps may or may not be used with 4 ohm speaker systems, but Emotiva's speaker line is all 4 ohm. I don't know, however, if they recommend the UPA amps with their speaker lines.
No what a full bandwidth ACD test verifies is an unrealistic test condition that would never occur in real life. EVERYONE that does ACD testing does it at 1kHz. I do that too, but I also do full bandwidth for up to two channels per FTC standard.
Read: The All Channels Driven (ACD) Amplifier Test — Reviews and News from Audioholics [audioholics.com]
gene;908668
I do full bandwidth tests with 2CH driven something hardly anyone does. It's simply ridiculous to do full bandwidth testing with all channels driven.
Hi Gene,
What these ACD full bandwidth tests do is demonstrate whether the amp in question can do what the manufacturer says it can do, that's why I like them. I may be out of touch, but us little guys have no way of verifying what these manufacturers are saying their products can do. I like Reagan's old line, "Trust, but verify". If an amp is advertised at 80 watts by 5 channels, then it should be able to put out 80 watts x 5 channels to my way of thinking.
These amps may or may not be used with 4 ohm speaker systems, but Emotiva's speaker line is all 4 ohm. I don't know, however, if they recommend the UPA amps with their speaker lines.

