Skip to content. Skip to navigation
You are here: Home News & Opinion Industry News Round 2 - Gibson Sues Rock Band & Guitar Hero
#########
   Alabama
   Alaska
   Arizona
   Arkansas
   California
   Colorado
   Connecticut
   DC
   Delaware
   Florida
   Georgia
   Hawaii
   Idaho
   Illinois
   Indiana
   Iowa
   Kansas
   Kentucky
   Louisiana
   Maine
   Maryland
   Massachusetts
   Michigan
   Minnesota
   Mississippi
   Missouri
   Montana
   Nebraska
   Nevada
   New Hampshire
   New Jersey
   New Mexico
   New York
   North Carolina
   North Dakota
   Ohio
   Oklahoma
   Oregon
   Pennsylvania
   Rhode Island
   South Carolina
   South Dakota
   Tennesee
   Texas
   Utah
   Vermont
   Virginia
   Washington
   West Virginia
   Wisconsin
   Wyoming
 

Round 2 - Gibson Sues Rock Band & Guitar Hero

by Clint DeBoer last modified March 26, 2008
The lawsuits could result in new controllers

The lawsuits could result in new controllers

When it rains it pours. The preemptive lawsuit filed by Activision, maker of Guitar Hero, over Gibson's patent dispute has taken a turn for the worse. Gibson Guitar now said that it has filed a lawsuit against MTV networks, Harmonix and Electronic Arts citing patent infringement related to both Rock Band and Guitar Hero video games. Ouch. And this after Activision had already licensed the Gibson guitar extensively for use as a controller.

The lawsuit relates to the same patent which Gibson claims violates a 1999 patent for technology to "simulate a musical performance." It seems everyone will be affected one way or another as Harmonix developed Guitar Hero, was later bought by MTV, Electronic Arts publishes Rock Band, and Activision sells other games in the Guitar Hero series. Oh, what a tangled web we weave.

Harmonix was quoted by Reuters as saying: "This lawsuit is completely without merit and we intend to defend it vigorously." Yeah, no doubt. After receiving a rather strong notification letter, Activision filed a lawsuit asking the U.S. District Court of Central California to declare Gibson's 1999 patent invalid and bar it from seeking damages. Given the fact that Gibson has been a high profile partner in the series, it's hard to fathom where this patent dispute came from. Somebody must have opened up a shoebox and discovered it, realizing that they had some sort of angle and/or claim to the underlying technology.

Perhaps Activision's strongest argument at this point centers around the fact that Gibson has technically granted an "implied license" for any patented technology simply by waiting 3 years to bring up any disputes. Which begs the question: Is there such a thing as squatter's rights for patent infringements?

Recent Forum Posts:

 
Join our Newsletter for News & Deals
#########