Skip to content. Skip to navigation
You are here: Home News & Opinion Industry News Comcast Compresses HD - No One Shocked
#########
   Alabama
   Alaska
   Arizona
   Arkansas
   California
   Colorado
   Connecticut
   DC
   Delaware
   Florida
   Georgia
   Hawaii
   Idaho
   Illinois
   Indiana
   Iowa
   Kansas
   Kentucky
   Louisiana
   Maine
   Maryland
   Massachusetts
   Michigan
   Minnesota
   Mississippi
   Missouri
   Montana
   Nebraska
   Nevada
   New Hampshire
   New Jersey
   New Mexico
   New York
   North Carolina
   North Dakota
   Ohio
   Oklahoma
   Oregon
   Pennsylvania
   Rhode Island
   South Carolina
   South Dakota
   Tennesee
   Texas
   Utah
   Vermont
   Virginia
   Washington
   West Virginia
   Wisconsin
   Wyoming
 

Comcast Compresses HD - No One Shocked

by Tom Andry last modified April 22, 2008
This is Battlestar Galactica on Comcast

This is Battlestar Galactica on Comcast

In a news item that should have all of the Audioholic audience thinking, "and?" - The Associated Press is reporting that Comcast and other cable companies are compressing their HD signals in order to deliver more content. We've been discussing this over at AV Rant for some time now and even have a listener who is contacting Time Warner's CEO directly to see what he has to say about it.

The "pass the buck" mentality was in full effect as Sci-fi, under fire in the article because of its soft HD picture, referred all questions to Comcast. Comcast admits that they are shoving 3 HD channels into the space of one analogue channel in some cases!

3 to 1!

Other channels are getting 2 to 1 compression though Comcast spokespeople wouldn't admit which channels are getting the increased compression. Don't worry Comcast - we can tell. The interesting part of this story is that some of the data being used to show how bad Comcast is compressing their channels was gathered from AVS. The post, which compared Comcast to Verizon FIOS shows clearly the picture differences between the two services. Verizon, with their fiber optic FIOS network, doesn't compress their channels at all but only serve about one million people in 17 states. Comcast serves over 24 million.

The problem, claim the cable companies, is infrastructure. There is only so much cable out there and people are demanding more and more HD content (I know I am). Compression is going to be a fact of life for those outside of Verizon's FIOS system though it doesn't have to be as visibly apparent as it is with some of the channels. While the AP suggests that poor HD picture can come from miscalibrated displays (true) or ambient lighting conditions (huh?), Comcast and Time Warner are working on solutions.

One of the solutions, switched video, only sends the channels that you are watching and not all of them at once. This could slow down channel switching times (meaning you can make a sandwich instead of just getting a beer while waiting for the channel to change), but it would increase available bandwidth. We wonder if it would be possible to effectively "delete" unwatched channels at the user's discretion so that favorite channels would have as much bandwidth available to them as possible. Other alternatives include instituting alternative compressions schemes such as MPEG4.

After paying $5000 for a TV and $500 for surround speakers, Joe Consumer expects to see a difference. If Comcast and others can't figure out how to get HD to their consumer's homes, we're going to see a greater and greater outcry. Bring it on, we say. Until the general public gets up and arms, all the complaining on the net will be for naught.

Recent Forum Posts:

Post Reply
audioman00 posts on April 27, 2008 13:52
Good job standing up for signal integrity. Your a stand up guy man!
TBG posts on April 26, 2008 16:30
This may come as a surprise to some, but fitting 3 HD signals in 1 channel in cable provides about the same bit rate as what typical broadcasters provide.

First, understand that we're not talking about "3 to 1" compression. An uncompressed HD signal is 1.5 Gb/s, so any consumer HD MPEG-2 source, typically 10-20 Mb/s (and this includes digital cable, broadcast, satellite, Blu-Ray) will be more like 100:1 compression.

Your local TV station can fit 19.2 Mb/s in their 6 MHz channel. Most carry sub channels with weather, news, local programming, etc., and what's left for the HD signal is usually closer to 12-15 Mb/s.

Assuming your cable company is using 256-QAM modulation, they can fit 40 Mb/s in that same 6 MHz channel. So, even with 3 HD services in one RF channel, it's around 13.3 Mb/s, so it's about the same bit rate as the HD channel from your local OTA station.
MUDSHARK posts on April 24, 2008 21:48
stratman;404096
My friend swore up and down there was no PQ difference between Comcast HD and Direct TV HD, he goes and buys a 58" Panny, orders Comcast HD, compares my PQ (Direct TV HD) to his.......................he's getting rid of Comcast. He's not a techie or an A/V'er, just an attorney.........yet he could see the difference.


marvelman74 posts on April 24, 2008 20:17
I work for comcast (a recent Insight acquisition) in central Illinois. and dont like them any more than the next guy. Some people really hate us. It is quite frustrating going into someones house for a service call and get to hear 10 minutes of ranting before they let me fix their problem. But on to the compression issue. I know for a fact that in our system 2 to 1 compression is the most we do. Many people have asked about it but we dont do more than 2 to 1. We run a 875mhz system and there is only so much bandwidth. There are 75 analog channel, to many digitals to count and then the broadband frequencies. If we did no compression then channels would have to be taken out for them to be added.
One possible reason for poor HD reception in some homes is that HD is sent over cable at a really high frequency. If your getting audio drop outs and pixelation then it can be result of weak signal on the high end. Low signal hitting your house from the plant, too many splits, old splitters that dont pass up to 1 gig, long lengths of cables and such will greatly effect your HD pics.

I dont want to start any arguments on here but that is what is going on in the system I work in. Other Comcast systems may not be so Comcastic.

And only if the broadcasters could figure out their end so I dont get cutouts in American Idol........
aarond posts on April 23, 2008 20:43
I have time warner basic cable only because i had no choice. it was broadband for $49.99 or broadband and basic cable for $44.99, go figure?
when the guy came to hook up I was watching ABC/HD ota and he asks so you already have cable? I ask him since when does time warner have any channel close to this quality. he started telling me about the hd package. i had him go get an hd box from the truck and hooked it up we toggled between my free hd and the pay hd. i think that even he was surprised at how much better the free hd was. he put the hd box back in the truck. i would like to have Discovery hd but i'm not paying 20 extra bucks for one semi hd channel.
Post Reply
 
Join our Newsletter for News & Deals
#########