Part 2: Listening versus Hearing Audio
So how does this rant come full circle and point to my own lost ability to ‘listen’ and found ability to only ‘hear’? About 2 years ago I purchased a Linn Unidisc player which can play MP3s, SACDs, DVD-As, VCDs, etc… I immediately pulled out my collection of high resolution audio disc formats and began sampling and smiling, thrilled that I was wise enough not to buy both an SACD and DVD-A stand alone player, opting instead for a Sony DVD player that also played SACDs, until a unified player came along, even if it meant my DVD-As were relegated primarily to digital 2 channel output only. My new player was all things to all people, and the best of all those at that, so I grabbed my high-resolution discs, along with several of my MP3 CDs lying around from my car use (again, not an environment needing superior audio fidelity, or so I thought until this story broke the other day) and put my ears to the test once again. The high-resolution formats were clean, sharp, amazing, deep, truly breathtaking, but I suffered from “only 2 to 3 good songs on a CD” syndrome, and this required that I be in constant motion, changing discs and skipping tracks. The MP3s were vulgar, noisy, shallow, coarse, simple, ubiquitous, easy… In other words, they sounded like a cat being shoved through a tennis racket, but several hours of uninterrupted audio without investing in a multi-room Sonos system costing multiple thousands of dollars became a bit more appealing. I stopped listening critically for Miles Davis to breathe between transcendent arpeggios, and reverted to my Army barracks room philosophy of “the volume knob at some point negates the noise in the track, the room, and everything” and just started hearing music… LOUD. I even docked my uPodd (my nickname for my non Apple device with the extra 'd' added for insurance against litigation) into my main system so I could go straight from my earbuds to the stereo with a minimum of interruption.
So is this a redemption song? Was I once lost only recently to be found? Has this sheep begun to stray from the flock? I can say unequivocally, in one strong and clear voice… Sort of! The simple fact is that I AM a member of the “grunt and nod generation” and I couldn’t live without, in theory, being able to drive from here (South Dakota) to Tokyo and back at 25mph without once hearing the same song repeated. Convenience, technophilia, knowing more than “the squares”, and just having my musical motivation with me at all times have pervaded my every cell and fiber. However, I feel as though I just took a sip of an extra spicy Bloody Mary the morning after a long night out with the boys… The fog is slowly lifting, I can’t help but see the error of my previous night’s endeavors, but the only fix is the hair of the dog that bit me. A couple weeks ago while moving, I opened my crate of SACDs, DVD-As and even HDCDs, which hadn’t gone ignored, but hadn’t been properly admired over the past 2 years either. I put that crate at the top of my home theater boxes and began the torturous, yet somehow enjoyable process of first boxing, then opening and reconnecting all my electronics. As a part of my set-up, I listened to various pieces of music I knew intimately, watched movies that I could transcribe in my sleep, and generally critiqued my setup. What an opportunity to use my collection! Out came Quaudiophiliac and Time Will Tell, The Allman Brothers Band at Fillmore East and Raise Your Spirit Higher. A chill thrilled down my spine, in 2.0/2.1 and 5.0/5.1 mixes, the detail, resolution, character, heart, inspiration, and desire in every syllable and instrument was felt and experienced again, as if I were back in that listening room those many years ago! All those discs have gone from the box in the other room, to positions as honored guests in my home theater system once again.
I mourned the passing of both great formats (even though a few are being made independently on occasion, both formats are essentially dead) and while consumer confusion did, in my opinion, deal the death blow even more so than an upstart computer company trying to make a buck, the fact is that CDs are generally good enough for most people, and the average consumer believes his or her stereo/theater system probably can’t resolve all the detail in those recordings, however untrue that may be. Is the “CD is good enough” vibe the result of the apathy of the human ear resulting from an inundation of inferior audio quality, or is it more personal than that, from something within each and every one of us, a simple “I don’t need anything more than that” conciliation? I can’t say for certain, but knowing that the human condition points us toward constant improvement in everything we do, I can’t help but feel that this malaise is the result of marketing savvy and external influences rather than some voice from within.
What are your thoughts? Do you live and die by the ebb and flow of ones and zeros, or is that pocket maestro only there to tide you over until you can come home to the real deal? Sound off in the forum and vote your conscience, am I waxing poetic for a time thankfully gone and hopefully soon forgotten, or is there an audio quality reckoning of sorts just over the horizon?
I hope we find out.
pereze;291814
Correct me if I am wrong, but lossless is pretty darn good.
The problem I have with all of these articles about dumbing down audio and such is that they always assume that anyone with an "mp3" player is using it for just that, compressed music. Yes, I would say most people are probably buying songs off one of the many stores such as iTunes and listening away, but there are a lot of people that rip there music into a lossless format and then use there storage device (mp3 player) to listen to the music.
It is my understanding the Apple's lossless format (not sure of the others) is pretty good quality. Ok, so what is pretty good, not sure but I would venture to say CD quality although i have never done a side by side comparison.
I personally don't think the iPod is the end of audio, but that seems to be the focus of many articles and discussions.
Eric
Lossless is exactly what its name says, lossless. A true lossless format will have no differences from the original source. While there might be certain compression methods used they will still sound the same as the source which is the important part. One of the issues this article is taking is with the compression that removes or distorts music for the masses and ease of use. MP3s, the most popular downloadable format, are not lossless for the record, especially at the quality levels offered by most services (192kbs with some delving to 256kbs).
I personally keep all my music on my computer in lossless formats for ease of use but I am not loosing any quality when I do so .
The problem I have with all of these articles about dumbing down audio and such is that they always assume that anyone with an "mp3" player is using it for just that, compressed music. Yes, I would say most people are probably buying songs off one of the many stores such as iTunes and listening away, but there are a lot of people that rip there music into a lossless format and then use there storage device (mp3 player) to listen to the music.
It is my understanding the Apple's lossless format (not sure of the others) is pretty good quality. Ok, so what is pretty good, not sure but I would venture to say CD quality although i have never done a side by side comparison.
I personally don't think the iPod is the end of audio, but that seems to be the focus of many articles and discussions.
Eric
skizzerflake;291704
It's not that I don't use them for portable media, it's just that I keep in mind that the algorithm works by removing 90% of the data and replacing it with approximations. What would you expect? Surprised that it's different? Why?
Like I said, you have no idea how it works but pride yourself on bashing it every chance you get.
MDS;290837
skizzerflake, clueless as usual regarding MP3. If your MP3 are 'swishy' and sound horrible it's because you used a too low bitrate. That's your problem, not the fault of the format.
Vinyl sounds better than MP3? LMAO.
Bitrate is just a question of how awful. Once the swishiness goes away with a higher bitrate, the grittiness shows up. If I have a problem it is only that I want good, undistorted sound, and that never happens with mp3. Been through thousands of those things, different codecs and software and every time I hear one I get that sinking feeling...missing music...good only for the subway. It's not that I don't use them for portable media, it's just that I keep in mind that the algorithm works by removing 90% of the data and replacing it with approximations. What would you expect? Surprised that it's different? Why?
As for vinyl sounding better than MP3....my God...complete slam dunk. Not even any competition there.
Vinyl sounds better than MP3? LMAO.
