Skip to content. Skip to navigation
You are here: Home AV University Loudspeaker Basics Vertical vs Horizontal Center Speaker Designs Addendum $7000 Tower Speaker
#########
   Alabama
   Alaska
   Arizona
   Arkansas
   California
   Colorado
   Connecticut
   DC
   Delaware
   Florida
   Georgia
   Hawaii
   Idaho
   Illinois
   Indiana
   Iowa
   Kansas
   Kentucky
   Louisiana
   Maine
   Maryland
   Massachusetts
   Michigan
   Minnesota
   Mississippi
   Missouri
   Montana
   Nebraska
   Nevada
   New Hampshire
   New Jersey
   New Mexico
   New York
   North Carolina
   North Dakota
   Ohio
   Oklahoma
   Oregon
   Pennsylvania
   Rhode Island
   South Carolina
   South Dakota
   Tennesee
   Texas
   Utah
   Vermont
   Virginia
   Washington
   West Virginia
   Wisconsin
   Wyoming
 

Addendum $7000 Tower Speaker

by Clint DeBoer last modified July 20, 2007

7000-vertical-rigging.jpgI wasn’t interested in including my Infinity IRS Epsilon that I use as a center channel in the results, because it:

  • Doesn’t have any driver redundancy
  • Isn’t horizontal without killing someone
  • Lacks any similar model to compare it to, and
  • Is not a design that is in current production (originally $14,000 per pair)

But while I had the test equipment setup, I was curious about how well it measured. Were my guests actually enjoying a coherent center channel sound, or were they just saying what they needed to get me to go away?

As you can see in the below 1/6 octave horizontal frequency response chart, the vertical array of drivers do not exhibit wave interference. There is a fall off in the top frequencies of the tweeter, which is common.

7000-vertical-chart1.jpg

Infinity’s Cary Christie explained in his white paper on this speaker, “As the wavelengths approach the dimensions of the diaphragm, the waveshape begins to become planar rather than spherical. In a typical [one inch] dome tweeter, for example, this narrowing, or “beaming” becomes serious at about 10 kHz. If the dome had flat power response, the on-axis response would actually rise, and some do, however most show a roll-off in power response due to the reactive mass of the dome. The on-axis frequency response of such a tweeter may show a ‘flat’ characteristic out to beyond 20 kHz, but this is only because the energy is concentrated in an increasingly narrower angle. The actual power response of the dome is falling off rapidly, beginning its drop-off as low as 6 kHz.” The somewhat improved the off-axis response of this planar tweeter by adding a second one in the back. Even though this could in theory cause wave interference across the horizontal plane, the back tweeter’s response is randomized by reflecting off the back wall. My speakers are 6.7 feet from the back wall, which reduces the rear tweeter’s ability to help out. Regardless, I still have much more top frequency roll-off away from center than the W(T/M)W speaker that was used in configurations 8 and 9. My credit card just moaned.

From the test results, wave interference from redundant horizontal drivers or crossover overlap is not an issue. However well the Epsilon can possibly sound in The Captain’s Chair, it responds consistently across all seats in the room. My guests are surely experiencing as good a sound as my budget allowed for, but I’d guess they’re still appeasing me somewhat with acclaim. The last thing they’ll do is encourage me to spend more money.

They just don’t understand.
 
Join our Newsletter for News & Deals
#########