Skip to content. Skip to navigation
You are here: Home AV University Cables and Interconnects HDMI 1.3 and Cables Part 1: It's All in the Bitrate HDMI 1.3 Certification - A Real Dilemma
 

HDMI 1.3 Certification - A Real Dilemma

by Clint DeBoer last modified August 28, 2007

So what's so special about certification? Nothing, if you're running a 3 foot HDMI from the DVD player to an LCD panel. Just about any old cable will do. However, if you are going to install a cable that is in danger of hitting upon the maximum potential of the format and you're putting that cable into a wall or ceiling - you might want to spend a little extra and buy from a company that guarantees and tests its products.

The interesting thing about certification, however, is that HDMI Licensing, LLC doesn't even account for the real-world situation where chip manufacturers don't fully support 3.4 Gbit/s bitrates. No one we know of supports the theoretical maximums. As a result, the real-world bit-rates of 2.2275 for 1080p at 12-bit color needs to be tested using the same criteria as the 1080i cable that only needs to pass 742.5 Mbit/s. That's right, there is currently no certification for 1080p at 12-bit. Are you scared? You should be.

So far, from what we understand, HDMI certification is largely a very fast and loose (not to mention expensive and apparently profitable) program that does nothing to truly ensure any of the manufacturer's production cables meet or exceed any practical current specification. Why do we say this? Simple. The HDMI testing standard has two categories currently:

  • Category 1 is for 720p and 1080i cables at 8-bit color. This is the "chump change" spec that was business as usual before HDMI 1.3 and, unless the connectors fall off, any Chinese-made cable is going to hit this for at least 4-5 meters without a hiccup.
  • Category 2 is the balls-to-the-wall 3.4 Gbit/s (non-existent) standard. The only silicone that exists on the market beyond Category 1 is rated to handle up to 2.25Gbit/s. For certification you either test level 1 (duh) or level 2 (meaning you must over-design your product.)

What the HDMI people should have done is inserted a real Category 2 certification for real-world 1080p/60 12-bit color (~2.25Gbit/s) since that bitrate is supported by silicon chipsets. "Category 3" could then take on the theoretical maximums of 3.4Gbit/s for future-ready products such as cables (since no electronics can pass the theoretical maximums at present).

Conclusion

So where does this all lead? To a grand new adventure. Progress is good, but HDMI v1.3 was a bit of an artificial "nudge" in a direction consumers didn't necessarily feel the need to take. Even so, I believe it will all work out on the end and it did allow cable manufacturers (the serious ones) to quickly realize the need for active solutions to ensure signal stability and integrity for longer cable runs. Without the increased bitrates this may have taken longer and more consumers would be installing cables that wouldn't pass the high bitrate signals now present in an ever-increasing amount of consumer electronics. The key to remember is that you cannot install an HDMI cable in your ceiling or wall that is designed to pass Category 1 specs (742.5 Mbit/s) and assume they will be just fine for features such as 1080p and 12-bit Deep Color. Pay attention and ask questions so that you aren't pulling your hair out down the line as you rip open your walls and curse your custom installer for letting you take the cheap way out!

Special thanks to Steven Barlow of DVIGear for technical contributions to this article.

 

Recent Forum Posts:

Post Reply
reznor11 posts on October 24, 2007 11:21
Oh just wait until part 2 which goes into the rather unbelievable practices of one of the main companies behind HDMI. It will be absolutely eye-opening.

Any idea when part 2 will be posted?
mtrycrafts posts on August 25, 2007 21:50
I believe those bitrates are x3 for the red, green, and blue color channels. Most engineers and manufacturers use the per color channel numbers of 8-bit, 10-bit, 12-bit, 16-bit while marketing people like the "big" additive numbers.

Yes, as you indicated why would you add them if they are individual colors, RGB since each has its own wire and the other color wire doesn't affect the bit rate flow of its neighbor wires, does it?
So, While the overall bit rate may be so high, each wire is taking its share and there is no worry about capacity
Clint DeBoer posts on August 25, 2007 10:45
mtrycrafts;300157
Go down to the bottom of the page with the chart for bitrates. The numbers I quoted came from it and is the max with video and audio for Hi Def DVDs. So, if that is the max it can download, isn't that the bitrate in the HDMI cable?
I believe those bitrates are x3 for the red, green, and blue color channels. Most engineers and manufacturers use the per color channel numbers of 8-bit, 10-bit, 12-bit, 16-bit while marketing people like the "big" additive numbers.
MDS posts on August 24, 2007 18:57
Alamar;300923
IBeing a newb I'm a little confused by that.

Are you saying that the older RPTV 1080i sets are not HDTV or are you saying that they are really basically 540P?


No, I'm saying there is no such thing as a 1080i TV. A fixed pixel HDTV has one single resolution and always scans progressively. If the TV has a native resolution of 1366 x 768 but can accept 1080i (1920 x 1080 interlaced) people often say they have a 1080i TV, but in reality it is a 768p TV that happens to accept a higher resolution as input.
Alamar posts on August 24, 2007 17:22
Oh just wait until part 2 which goes into the rather unbelievable practices of one of the main companies behind HDMI. It will be absolutely eye-opening.

I know I wasn't the target of the comment but thanks for the heads-up. As a newb anything that I can find out about the real workings of what's going on is helpful.

************* To avoid the double post ******************

@MDS:
MDS
No HDTV is 1080i. All HDTVs are progressive scan. 1080i may be the highest resolution it can accept as an input but it will always scale whatever is input to its native resolution. So if this tv 'upconverts' to 1080p then it IS 1080p - its native resolution is 1920 x 1080p. It just cannot accept a native 1080p signal as an input.


Being a newb I'm a little confused by that.

Are you saying that the older RPTV 1080i sets are not HDTV or are you saying that they are really basically 540P?

******************************************************

MTRYCRAFTS
How does this mesh with the hi def DVDs max transfer rates of 36 or 54Mbits/s?
Isn't this the transfer rate going through the cables? A bit of difference between this and the Gbit rate in the article.


This isn't exactly right but you could think of the data transfer on the Hi Def DVD being how fast the player can read from the disk. This is the 30-50Mb/s number that you mentioned.

The data on the disk is highly compressed / zipped. The signals that the Hi Def DVD player sends out are uncompressed which is why the Hi Def DVD player sends out MUCH MUCH more data than it actually reads.

Basically the Hi Def DVD is zipped and what your TV gets is unzipped. This explains the big difference in data rate and total data over time.
Post Reply
 
Join our Newsletter for News & Deals