Skip to content. Skip to navigation
You are here: Home AV University Audio Formats & Technology Dynamic Comparison SACD vs CD - Part 5 Dynamic Comparison SACD vs CD - Part 5 - page 2
#########
   Alabama
   Alaska
   Arizona
   Arkansas
   California
   Colorado
   Connecticut
   DC
   Delaware
   Florida
   Georgia
   Hawaii
   Idaho
   Illinois
   Indiana
   Iowa
   Kansas
   Kentucky
   Louisiana
   Maine
   Maryland
   Massachusetts
   Michigan
   Minnesota
   Mississippi
   Missouri
   Montana
   Nebraska
   Nevada
   New Hampshire
   New Jersey
   New Mexico
   New York
   North Carolina
   North Dakota
   Ohio
   Oklahoma
   Oregon
   Pennsylvania
   Rhode Island
   South Carolina
   South Dakota
   Tennesee
   Texas
   Utah
   Vermont
   Virginia
   Washington
   West Virginia
   Wisconsin
   Wyoming
 

Dynamic Comparison SACD vs CD - Part 5 - page 2

by Chris Tham last modified September 05, 2004

Using the first track (What A Shame), here are the relative differences using the "Analyze | Statistics …" function on Cool Edit:


CDR

CD

SACD

Peak Amplitude (dB):

-4.26

-3.68

-2.93

Minimum RMS Power (dB):

-80.92

-88.22

-85.07

Maximum RMS Power (dB):

-13.57

-12.08

-11.33

Average RMS Power (dB):

-27.30

-26.13

-25.40

Total RMS Power (dB):

-25.63

-24.38

-23.64

Maximum - Average RMS Power (dB):

13.73

14.05

14.07

Maximum - Minimum RMS Power (dB):

67.35

76.15

73.74

As you can see, the SCD-XA777ES reproduces both the CD-R and the CD layer of the Hybrid disc reasonably faithfully compared to the digital rips (except with a higher noise floor). The statistics also confirm how close the CD and SACD layers are. The SACD layer is obviously slightly louder, and this could account for me finding Patricia's vocals a bit more engaging on SACD.

Track 11 (Nardis)

Here is a close-up showing that the SACD has much higher peaks on Track 11 ( Nardis ):

chart2-1a.gif chart2-1b.gif
omparing an excerpt from track 11 on CD (left) and SACD (right)

Intrigued, I looked at the digital rip of track 11 from the CD layer, and found one possible explanation: evidence of clipping on the CD layer limiting the dynamics of that track. This is confirmed by the "Analyze | Statistics …" function on Cool Edit:


Left

Right

Average

Min Sample Value:

-32768.00

-32768.00

-32768.00

Max Sample Value:

32767.00

32767.00

32767.00

Peak Amplitude:

0.00

0.00

0.00

Possibly Clipped:

8

4

6

DC Offset:

0

0

0

Minimum RMS Power:

-94.33

-94.32

-94.33

Maximum RMS Power:

-10.62

-10.74

-10.68

Average RMS Power:

-26.47

-25.96

-26.22

Total RMS Power:

-23.71

-23.31

-23.51

Actual Bit Depth:

16 Bits

16 Bits


Maximum - Minimum RMS (dB):

83.71

83.58

83.65

Maximum - Average RMS (dB):

15.85

15.22

15.54

Here is the graph of the CD recording of track 11:

chart2-2.jpg
Recording of track 11 (Nardis) – CD layer of Hybrid disc.
 
Join our Newsletter for News & Deals
#########