Skip to content. Skip to navigation
You are here: Home AV University Amplifier Technology Switching Amplifiers: The Technology and the Issues
#########
   Alabama
   Alaska
   Arizona
   Arkansas
   California
   Colorado
   Connecticut
   DC
   Delaware
   Florida
   Georgia
   Hawaii
   Idaho
   Illinois
   Indiana
   Iowa
   Kansas
   Kentucky
   Louisiana
   Maine
   Maryland
   Massachusetts
   Michigan
   Minnesota
   Mississippi
   Missouri
   Montana
   Nebraska
   Nevada
   New Hampshire
   New Jersey
   New Mexico
   New York
   North Carolina
   North Dakota
   Ohio
   Oklahoma
   Oregon
   Pennsylvania
   Rhode Island
   South Carolina
   South Dakota
   Tennesee
   Texas
   Utah
   Vermont
   Virginia
   Washington
   West Virginia
   Wisconsin
   Wyoming
 

Switching Amplifiers: The Technology and the Issues

by Dan Banquer last modified March 06, 2007
Contributors: Gene DellaSala

This article started because a good friend of mine dropped a Panasonic SA-XR50 switch-mode amplifier to me for some basic bench test. This article will NOT be a review of that unit, but an investigation into some of the issues that are happening with this technology.

When I put this unit on the bench it was noted that the out-of-band noise components were so high that they interfered with all of the in-band measurements I was trying to make. In-band measurement of this class of amplifiers must be done with special filters that severely attenuate the out-of-band components preventing interference with in-band measurements.

But the major focus of the article will not be concerned with in-band measurements, but other equally important issues. I have been lucky enough to get Mike Danielson, who is primarily responsible for the DDX™ family of switching amplifiers, and Bruno Putzeys, formerly with Phillips and currently chief engineer, R & D, for Hypex to contribute their expertise to this article.

Measurements

In order to obtain the best possible accuracy of readings, I managed to get my hands on a LeCroy oscilloscope with a set of true differential probes for the best possible accuracy. Most scopes are O.K. for a differential measurement at low frequencies but higher frequency content requires a true differential probe set as the one LeCroy supplied. This is crucial for accurate measurement of the unit in question since the speaker outputs are differential outputs as opposed to the usual linear amplifier outputs, which are "unbalanced". In addition, I utilized a CD player's SPDIF digital output playing a CBS CD1 test disc to provide the 1 kHz test sine wave. The following scope shot and FFT plot (figure 1) is shown below:

1clip_image002_065.gif

Please note the following: The Red trace shown above is from a signal generator and is shown to demonstrate what a typical sine wave looks like coming out of a linear device. The trace in yellow is the actual 1 kHz sine wave from the Panasonic SA-XR50 driving an 8 ohm resistive load, at a power of approximately 5 watts rms. The lower trace shown in Orange is the FFT plot of the Panasonic SA-XR50 output (shown in yellow). Please note the following: #1 on the plot is at 1 kHz and referenced to 0db. #2 is at 90 to 110 kHz and is approximately - 20db down from the 1 KHz fundamental. (Note: This is possibly one of two things; switching power supply ripple or noise shaping, I suspect noise shaping.) # 3 is at approximately 350 kHz and is approximately - 25 db down from the 1 kHz fundamental, and #4 is at approximately 700 kHz and is approximately - 35 db down from the 1 KHz fundamental.

clip_image004_131.jpg

The scope shot provided in figure 2 has "zoomed in" on a small part of the output 1 kHz sine wave output wave to show the maximum output ripple, which is approximately 4 volts peak to peak at approximately 100 kHz.

The next scope and FFT plot (figure 3) shows the "reference sine wave from our signal generator. Note the lack of out of band components.

clip_image006_093.jpg

As we can see from our data there is a fair amount of out of band components from the output of the Panasonic receiver. So what does this mean when this energy hits the loudspeaker? I asked this question to loudspeaker designers and they have informed me of several facts. For the typical dynamic loudspeaker the impedance increases and is inductive, as the frequency rises above 20 kHz, so the power that develops across the tweeters voice coil is rather small. Will this cause Intermodulation distortion in the audio band? The math says no because the frequencies are too high, and the amount of power developed from the ultrasonic frequency components is low. So it appears that these higher order components should not damage your loudspeaker or cause I.M. distortion in the audio band. Some of the electrostatic loudspeakers are capacitive at higher frequencies in the audio band, but at ultrasonic frequencies the transformers used in the electrostatic loudspeakers will be inductive / resistive and by definition represent a high impedance load at ultrasonic frequencies. Will the frequency components at 350kHz and 700kHz interfere with AM radio band reception? Well, it might; if the radio or antenna is placed in close proximity to the speaker leads.

Please refer to the following two graphs supplied by Dick Pierce of one speaker and one tweeter showing the impedance of the speaker and tweeter out to 2 Mhz.

clip_image008_064.jpg

clip_image010_046.jpg

by Dan Banquer last modified March 06, 2007
Contributors: Gene DellaSala
 
Join our Newsletter for News & Deals
#########